Evaluating the feasibility of legally binding election manifestos

The feasibility of making electoral manifestos legally enforceable is investigated in the study using a descriptive technique. The theoretical groundwork on election manifestos, constitutional law, and applicable legal frameworks is laid out with an comprehensive literature analysis. By analyzing comparative models and case studies from select democracies, the research assesses the practical and legal challenges inherent in enforcing manifesto commitments. Through a synthesis of global practices and referenced expert perspectives, the paper evaluates the potential for legally binding frameworks to enhance political accountability. Based on this analysis, the study ultimately argues against enforceability due to significant structural, practical, political and ethical limitations, proposing instead a reformed approach to manifesto transparency through voluntary and impartial review mechanisms, preferably outside the remit of the legislative majority.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of High School Science
Published
2024-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64336/001c.125436
Primary Topic
Legal Language and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the feasibility of legally binding election manifestos

Journal of High School Science
Legal Language and Interpretation
article

Evaluating the feasibility of legally binding election manifestos

article en

Abstract

The feasibility of making electoral manifestos legally enforceable is investigated in the study using a descriptive technique. The theoretical groundwork on election manifestos, constitutional law, and applicable legal frameworks is laid out with an comprehensive literature analysis. By analyzing comparative models and case studies from select democracies, the research assesses the practical and legal challenges inherent in enforcing manifesto commitments. Through a synthesis of global practices and referenced expert perspectives, the paper evaluates the potential for legally binding frameworks to enhance political accountability. Based on this analysis, the study ultimately argues against enforceability due to significant structural, practical, political and ethical limitations, proposing instead a reformed approach to manifesto transparency through voluntary and impartial review mechanisms, preferably outside the remit of the legislative majority.

Journal of High School ScienceVol. 8(4)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Legal Language and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.