NEUTRALITY AND GENERALISATION IN NON-AGENTIVE RECEPTIVE VOICE: A CRITICAL LINGUISTIC STUDY OF EL-RUFAI'S THE ACCIDENTAL PUBLIC SERVANT

This paper presents and analyses the use of non-agentive receptive voice as a system of linguistic choice in El-Rufai’s The Accidental Public Servant and the linguistic components in such constructions. The objective is to find out how the use of such construction stands to be a choice from the set of options and how this choice creates some contextual implications. The data for the analysis are streamlined first using corpus software (The corpus software used is AntCon 3.5.8. text analysis software) and then, purposive sampling is used to select some fourteen (14) strands of clauses for the analysis. From the findings two different types of pragmatic/contextual implications are found, namely, neutrality and generalisation. These implications are, in essence, the effects that come up in non-agentive voice construction. These are what Simpson (1993) calls ‘pragmatic and contextual implications’.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Afrischolar Discovery
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60787/nijolee.vol2no2.51
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NEUTRALITY AND GENERALISATION IN NON-AGENTIVE RECEPTIVE VOICE: A CRITICAL LINGUISTIC STUDY OF EL-RUFAI'S THE ACCIDENTAL PUBLIC SERVANT

Afrischolar Discovery
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

NEUTRALITY AND GENERALISATION IN NON-AGENTIVE RECEPTIVE VOICE: A CRITICAL LINGUISTIC STUDY OF EL-RUFAI'S THE ACCIDENTAL PUBLIC SERVANT

article en

Abstract

This paper presents and analyses the use of non-agentive receptive voice as a system of linguistic choice in El-Rufai’s The Accidental Public Servant and the linguistic components in such constructions. The objective is to find out how the use of such construction stands to be a choice from the set of options and how this choice creates some contextual implications. The data for the analysis are streamlined first using corpus software (The corpus software used is AntCon 3.5.8. text analysis software) and then, purposive sampling is used to select some fourteen (14) strands of clauses for the analysis. From the findings two different types of pragmatic/contextual implications are found, namely, neutrality and generalisation. These implications are, in essence, the effects that come up in non-agentive voice construction. These are what Simpson (1993) calls ‘pragmatic and contextual implications’.

Afrischolar Discovery
Bayero University Kano (NG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.