Towards Developing a Comprehensive Methodical Framework for Evaluating Code Recommender Systems

The growing incorporation of code recommender systems is transforming software development, promising increased productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness through context-aware code suggestions.Despite these advancements, existing evaluation methods often fall short.They rely on computational metrics and synthetic benchmarks, failing to capture realworld software development environments' dynamic, human-centric nature.To enhance methods, techniques, and tools for evaluating code recommender systems, the aim is to create a new methodological framework.To achieve this goal, a multi-method approach will be employed, including a systematic literature review, along with user studies and online evaluations conducted in both a university setting and the automotive sector.By addressing practical challenges and involving human participants, the framework aims to thoroughly assess code recommender systems, ultimately providing empirical evidence of their impact on developers' productivity, efficiency, effectiveness, and perceived satisfaction.Furthermore, the research offers practical recommendations for designing more effective code recommender systems based on developers' needs and experiences.

Publication Details

Journal
WU Research
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57938/9f98cb58-fc8e-48c9-8343-42d666fdb24b
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Developing a Comprehensive Methodical Framework for Evaluating Code Recommender Systems

WU Research
Software Engineering Research
article

Towards Developing a Comprehensive Methodical Framework for Evaluating Code Recommender Systems

article en

Abstract

The growing incorporation of code recommender systems is transforming software development, promising increased productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness through context-aware code suggestions.Despite these advancements, existing evaluation methods often fall short.They rely on computational metrics and synthetic benchmarks, failing to capture realworld software development environments' dynamic, human-centric nature.To enhance methods, techniques, and tools for evaluating code recommender systems, the aim is to create a new methodological framework.To achieve this goal, a multi-method approach will be employed, including a systematic literature review, along with user studies and online evaluations conducted in both a university setting and the automotive sector.By addressing practical challenges and involving human participants, the framework aims to thoroughly assess code recommender systems, ultimately providing empirical evidence of their impact on developers' productivity, efficiency, effectiveness, and perceived satisfaction.Furthermore, the research offers practical recommendations for designing more effective code recommender systems based on developers' needs and experiences.

WU Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Software Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards Developing a Comprehensive Methodical Framework for Evaluating Code Recommender Systems · WU Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS