Piersaloceras undetermined Teichert 1930

Piersaloceras (?) sp. Figs 30C, 31A Material examined ESTONIA • Sutlema old quarry; Kõrgessaare Formation, Vormsi Regional Stage; TUG 1827-163. Description The specimen is a fragment of a curved body chamber, preserved in its total length but lateral parts of the body chamber are missing (Fig. 30C). The outer shell is well-preserved, it is ornamented with narrowly spaced (ca 15–20 per 10 mm) imbricated frills (Fig. 31A), which are directly transverse, and parallel to the peristome. No hyponomic sinus occurs. In lateral view, both margins are curved. The curvature of the concave margin is wider than that of the convex margin, which results in a gibbous outline of the body chamber. The greatest conch height of 50 mm is located at ca mid-length of the body chamber. At its base, the height is 48 mm and at the aperture 43 mm. The suture, reconstructed from the base of the body chamber, forms a narrow lateral lobe. No traces of the siphuncle and of the septal foramen are preserved. Remarks The characteristically frilled ornamentation of this fragment is most similar to that of P. gageli Teichert, 1930, which, in turn, is known only from a single, immature specimen. It differs from the type specimen (and, to date, only known specimen of this genus) in lacking the longitudinal furrows on the impression of the mold, which could be an effect of the typical oncoceratid longitudinal ridges, and which is present in more apical conch parts of many oncocerids (see discussion in Frye 1987: 92). Because details of the siphuncle and parts of the phragmocone are unknown from the specimen described above, a definite determination is not possible. The general shape of the body chamber is similar to that of Redpathoceras saxbyense sp. nov., and to Uranoceratidae, such as Deckeroceras Foerste, 1935b. The mature body chamber of the former is however longer (68 mm) and at its base less high (45 mm). More complete, better-preserved material is needed to evaluate the relationship of this specimen to Redpathoceras, or whether Piersaloceras might belong to the Uranoceratidae or Probillingsitidae Flower, 1941. Notably, some oncoceratids, such as Beloitoceras or Neumatoceras also have similarly shaped body chambers, but are more strongly compressed and have a hyponomic sinus. This could link oncoceratids and uranoceratids, as suggested by the phylogeny in Pohle et al. (2022).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15150609
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Piersaloceras undetermined Teichert 1930

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mental Health via Writing
article

Piersaloceras undetermined Teichert 1930

article en

Abstract

Piersaloceras (?) sp. Figs 30C, 31A Material examined ESTONIA • Sutlema old quarry; Kõrgessaare Formation, Vormsi Regional Stage; TUG 1827-163. Description The specimen is a fragment of a curved body chamber, preserved in its total length but lateral parts of the body chamber are missing (Fig. 30C). The outer shell is well-preserved, it is ornamented with narrowly spaced (ca 15–20 per 10 mm) imbricated frills (Fig. 31A), which are directly transverse, and parallel to the peristome. No hyponomic sinus occurs. In lateral view, both margins are curved. The curvature of the concave margin is wider than that of the convex margin, which results in a gibbous outline of the body chamber. The greatest conch height of 50 mm is located at ca mid-length of the body chamber. At its base, the height is 48 mm and at the aperture 43 mm. The suture, reconstructed from the base of the body chamber, forms a narrow lateral lobe. No traces of the siphuncle and of the septal foramen are preserved. Remarks The characteristically frilled ornamentation of this fragment is most similar to that of P. gageli Teichert, 1930, which, in turn, is known only from a single, immature specimen. It differs from the type specimen (and, to date, only known specimen of this genus) in lacking the longitudinal furrows on the impression of the mold, which could be an effect of the typical oncoceratid longitudinal ridges, and which is present in more apical conch parts of many oncocerids (see discussion in Frye 1987: 92). Because details of the siphuncle and parts of the phragmocone are unknown from the specimen described above, a definite determination is not possible. The general shape of the body chamber is similar to that of Redpathoceras saxbyense sp. nov., and to Uranoceratidae, such as Deckeroceras Foerste, 1935b. The mature body chamber of the former is however longer (68 mm) and at its base less high (45 mm). More complete, better-preserved material is needed to evaluate the relationship of this specimen to Redpathoceras, or whether Piersaloceras might belong to the Uranoceratidae or Probillingsitidae Flower, 1941. Notably, some oncoceratids, such as Beloitoceras or Neumatoceras also have similarly shaped body chambers, but are more strongly compressed and have a hyponomic sinus. This could link oncoceratids and uranoceratids, as suggested by the phylogeny in Pohle et al. (2022).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Finnish Museum of Natural History (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.