The Diplomatic History of Border Disputes in West Africa: Lessons from the Nigeria-Bakassi Peninsula Conflict

The persistent challenge of border disputes in West Africa, exemplified by the Bakassi Peninsula conflict between Nigeria and Cameroon, underscores the critical need for effective diplomatic mechanisms rooted in historical understanding. This study investigated the diplomatic history of border disputes in West Africa, focusing on the Bakassi conflict as a case study to draw vital lessons for conflict resolution and regional integration. The central problem addressed is the inadequacy of existing diplomatic frameworks in preventing border-related tensions and ensuring the protection of affected communities despite international rulings. The objectives of the study include exploring the historical causes of the Bakassi dispute and its historical causes, examining the diplomatic strategies employed in its resolution, and identifying best practices applicable to future disputes. Research questions were formulated guide inquiry into these themes. The significance of the study lies in its contribution to conflict resolution scholarship, international diplomacy, and regional peacebuilding. The scope covered the historical timeline of the Bakassi dispute, its diplomatic resolution through the International Court of Justice (ICJ), and the post-agreement implications for affected populations. The study adopted the realist theory of international relations, grounded in classical and neo-realist traditions, and offered critical insights into the motivations, interests, and power dynamics that underlie state behaviour in territorial disputes. The research employed interviews, documentary reviews, and thematic content analysis using qualitative methodology. Findings revealed that although international adjudication helped resolve the Bakassi dispute, local grievances remained largely unaddressed. The study concluded by recommending the strengthening of regional diplomatic institutions, prioritising community-based peace implementation, and enhancing legal capacity in international diplomacy across West African states. These policy recommendations offered pathways toward more sustainable conflict resolution.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16849429
Primary Topic
Global Political and Social Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Diplomatic History of Border Disputes in West Africa: Lessons from the Nigeria-Bakassi Peninsula Conflict

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Global Political and Social Dynamics
article

The Diplomatic History of Border Disputes in West Africa: Lessons from the Nigeria-Bakassi Peninsula Conflict

article en

Abstract

The persistent challenge of border disputes in West Africa, exemplified by the Bakassi Peninsula conflict between Nigeria and Cameroon, underscores the critical need for effective diplomatic mechanisms rooted in historical understanding. This study investigated the diplomatic history of border disputes in West Africa, focusing on the Bakassi conflict as a case study to draw vital lessons for conflict resolution and regional integration. The central problem addressed is the inadequacy of existing diplomatic frameworks in preventing border-related tensions and ensuring the protection of affected communities despite international rulings. The objectives of the study include exploring the historical causes of the Bakassi dispute and its historical causes, examining the diplomatic strategies employed in its resolution, and identifying best practices applicable to future disputes. Research questions were formulated guide inquiry into these themes. The significance of the study lies in its contribution to conflict resolution scholarship, international diplomacy, and regional peacebuilding. The scope covered the historical timeline of the Bakassi dispute, its diplomatic resolution through the International Court of Justice (ICJ), and the post-agreement implications for affected populations. The study adopted the realist theory of international relations, grounded in classical and neo-realist traditions, and offered critical insights into the motivations, interests, and power dynamics that underlie state behaviour in territorial disputes. The research employed interviews, documentary reviews, and thematic content analysis using qualitative methodology. Findings revealed that although international adjudication helped resolve the Bakassi dispute, local grievances remained largely unaddressed. The study concluded by recommending the strengthening of regional diplomatic institutions, prioritising community-based peace implementation, and enhancing legal capacity in international diplomacy across West African states. These policy recommendations offered pathways toward more sustainable conflict resolution.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Global Political and Social Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.