MECHANIZATION IN PRUNING AND ITS IMPACT ON THE YIELD OF TEA

This study evaluated the efficiency and economic viability of mechanized pruning compared to traditional manual pruning in mature tea plantations of Bangladesh. Conducted at the Bangladesh Tea Research Institute over a four-year period, the experiment tested three pruning treatments—manual pruning (T1), mechanized pruning only (T2), and mechanized pruning followed by manual repair (T3)—across four pruning types: Light Pruning (LP), Deep Skiff (DSK), Medium Skiff (MSK), and Light Skiff (LSK). Mechanized pruning significantly reduced labour time, with T2 being 1.3 to 3.0 times faster than T1. Fuel consumption was highest in LP and lowest in LSK. Despite minor yield differences among treatments, mechanization showed no significant negative impact on productivity. In fact, T2 and T3 often slightly outperformed manual pruning in LP and DSK. Economic analysis indicated that T3 was most profitable for LP and DSK, while T1 remained optimal for MSK and LSK. These results suggest that targeted mechanization in tea pruning can enhance efficiency and profitability without compromising yield.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15684395
Primary Topic
Tea Polyphenols and Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MECHANIZATION IN PRUNING AND ITS IMPACT ON THE YIELD OF TEA

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Tea Polyphenols and Effects
article

MECHANIZATION IN PRUNING AND ITS IMPACT ON THE YIELD OF TEA

article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficiency and economic viability of mechanized pruning compared to traditional manual pruning in mature tea plantations of Bangladesh. Conducted at the Bangladesh Tea Research Institute over a four-year period, the experiment tested three pruning treatments—manual pruning (T1), mechanized pruning only (T2), and mechanized pruning followed by manual repair (T3)—across four pruning types: Light Pruning (LP), Deep Skiff (DSK), Medium Skiff (MSK), and Light Skiff (LSK). Mechanized pruning significantly reduced labour time, with T2 being 1.3 to 3.0 times faster than T1. Fuel consumption was highest in LP and lowest in LSK. Despite minor yield differences among treatments, mechanization showed no significant negative impact on productivity. In fact, T2 and T3 often slightly outperformed manual pruning in LP and DSK. Economic analysis indicated that T3 was most profitable for LP and DSK, while T1 remained optimal for MSK and LSK. These results suggest that targeted mechanization in tea pruning can enhance efficiency and profitability without compromising yield.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Tea Polyphenols and Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.