X^∞ as a Recursive Infrastructure: Responsibility-Driven Replacement of Classical ITSM

This working paper introduces X^∞ (X to Infinity) as a mathematically auditable, responsibility-centric alternative to traditional IT service management (ITSM) frameworks such as ITIL 4. Grounded in Cap logic and systemic feedback mechanisms, X^∞ replaces static roles and opaque processes with dynamic authority units (Cap), recursive delegation, and intelligent need expression via CapPetitions. The model enables verifiable, zero-trust operations through constructs like CapNFT, CapGate, CapLedger, and ∆Cap, while fostering emergent alignment across complex infrastructures. The paper offers a full mapping of all 34 ITIL 4 practices—spanning general, service, and technical management—and demonstrates how each is transformed under the X^∞ paradigm. It formalizes a prioritization logic (P = N·w_E) that amplifies structurally relevant needs, particularly from underrepresented actors, and implements this in a prototype system capable of automatic delegation, feedback propagation, and incident attribution. A detailed case study highlights the operational superiority of X^∞ compared to classical frameworks, achieving faster incident resolution and proactive systemic improvement. This publication invites collaboration towards a silent revolution in IT governance and post-organizational infrastructure design.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15335843
Primary Topic
Access Control and Trust
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

X^∞ as a Recursive Infrastructure: Responsibility-Driven Replacement of Classical ITSM

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Access Control and Trust
article

X^∞ as a Recursive Infrastructure: Responsibility-Driven Replacement of Classical ITSM

article en

Abstract

This working paper introduces X^∞ (X to Infinity) as a mathematically auditable, responsibility-centric alternative to traditional IT service management (ITSM) frameworks such as ITIL 4. Grounded in Cap logic and systemic feedback mechanisms, X^∞ replaces static roles and opaque processes with dynamic authority units (Cap), recursive delegation, and intelligent need expression via CapPetitions. The model enables verifiable, zero-trust operations through constructs like CapNFT, CapGate, CapLedger, and ∆Cap, while fostering emergent alignment across complex infrastructures. The paper offers a full mapping of all 34 ITIL 4 practices—spanning general, service, and technical management—and demonstrates how each is transformed under the X^∞ paradigm. It formalizes a prioritization logic (P = N·w_E) that amplifies structurally relevant needs, particularly from underrepresented actors, and implements this in a prototype system capable of automatic delegation, feedback propagation, and incident attribution. A detailed case study highlights the operational superiority of X^∞ compared to classical frameworks, achieving faster incident resolution and proactive systemic improvement. This publication invites collaboration towards a silent revolution in IT governance and post-organizational infrastructure design.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Access Control and Trust
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

X^∞ as a Recursive Infrastructure: Responsibility-Driven Replacement of Classical ITSM · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS