The water retention role in the carbonation of air lime: hero or villain?

Recent studies have been focusing on the carbon sink potential of carbonatable binders as an attempt to reduce CO2 levels. Air lime is a carbonatable binder that fully relies on CO2 absorption to harden and, thus, offers great carbon sink potential. Yet, CO2 absorption is favoured only after the evaporation of the excess water. Therefore, this study investigated the behaviour of air lime-containing mortars regarding water retention and evaporation. Four groups (with different contents of air lime) were monitored for up to 91 days after curing. Results showed that higher contents of air lime yielded greater water retention capacity. Yet, water retention did not prevent the carbonation front from further advancing – especially within lime-cement groups. In this case, greater porosity proved to be an open door for the simultaneous evaporation and ingress of CO2. Thus, hero or villain? It depends on the mixture.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14772837
Primary Topic
Building materials and conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The water retention role in the carbonation of air lime: hero or villain?

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Building materials and conservation
article

The water retention role in the carbonation of air lime: hero or villain?

article en

Abstract

Recent studies have been focusing on the carbon sink potential of carbonatable binders as an attempt to reduce CO2 levels. Air lime is a carbonatable binder that fully relies on CO2 absorption to harden and, thus, offers great carbon sink potential. Yet, CO2 absorption is favoured only after the evaporation of the excess water. Therefore, this study investigated the behaviour of air lime-containing mortars regarding water retention and evaporation. Four groups (with different contents of air lime) were monitored for up to 91 days after curing. Results showed that higher contents of air lime yielded greater water retention capacity. Yet, water retention did not prevent the carbonation front from further advancing – especially within lime-cement groups. In this case, greater porosity proved to be an open door for the simultaneous evaporation and ingress of CO2. Thus, hero or villain? It depends on the mixture.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Building materials and conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.