Psychological Aspects оf Judicial Conflicts

Researching the psychological mechanisms behind the emergence and escalation of conflicts within judicial proceedings is relevant to enhancing the effectiveness of judicial activity, reducing conflict levels, and ensuring fair justice. The purpose of this study is to examine the psychological aspects of conflict emergence in the judicial sphere. Factors influencing the development of judicial conflicts are explored. It has been found that "person-to-person" conflicts (conflict between prosecutor and defense attorney, prosecutor and defendant, prosecutor and defense witness, attorney and victim, attorney and prosecution witness, defendant and victim) are objective, as they are programmed by the very procedure of case examination. It is emphasized that none of the objective conflicts involve the judge, allowing the judge to participate only in subjective conflicts.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14010230
Primary Topic
Education, Law, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Aspects оf Judicial Conflicts

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Education, Law, and Society
article

Psychological Aspects оf Judicial Conflicts

article en

Abstract

Researching the psychological mechanisms behind the emergence and escalation of conflicts within judicial proceedings is relevant to enhancing the effectiveness of judicial activity, reducing conflict levels, and ensuring fair justice. The purpose of this study is to examine the psychological aspects of conflict emergence in the judicial sphere. Factors influencing the development of judicial conflicts are explored. It has been found that "person-to-person" conflicts (conflict between prosecutor and defense attorney, prosecutor and defendant, prosecutor and defense witness, attorney and victim, attorney and prosecution witness, defendant and victim) are objective, as they are programmed by the very procedure of case examination. It is emphasized that none of the objective conflicts involve the judge, allowing the judge to participate only in subjective conflicts.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
National University Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic (UA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Education, Law, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.