Advancing Futures Studies: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Identifying and Addressing Critical Research Gaps

This study identifies current research gaps within the field of futures studies. It aims to clarify research priorities and direct scholarly attention toward underexplored areas. By identifying these gaps, the study seeks to inform the global foresight community and support the advancement and practical relevance of the discipline. Through a mixed-methods design, the research integrates a comprehensive literature review with survey data collected from 215 foresight professionals and futures researchers. The analysis uncovers notable deficiencies in theoretical frameworks, methodological development, contextual applications, and emerging domains. The most pronounced gaps exist in contextual and emerging areas. Survey participants ranked methodological rigidity, technology and data analytics gaps, and participatory engagement gaps as the most urgent areas for further inquiry. The findings highlight the necessity of inclusive and participatory approaches in futures studies. Concrete recommendations are proposed, such as enhancing methodological rigor, embracing diverse viewpoints, and utilizing new technologies. This work establishes a foundation for subsequent investigations and aims to support the ongoing evolution of the field.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15350984
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Futures Studies: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Identifying and Addressing Critical Research Gaps

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Advancing Futures Studies: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Identifying and Addressing Critical Research Gaps

article en

Abstract

This study identifies current research gaps within the field of futures studies. It aims to clarify research priorities and direct scholarly attention toward underexplored areas. By identifying these gaps, the study seeks to inform the global foresight community and support the advancement and practical relevance of the discipline. Through a mixed-methods design, the research integrates a comprehensive literature review with survey data collected from 215 foresight professionals and futures researchers. The analysis uncovers notable deficiencies in theoretical frameworks, methodological development, contextual applications, and emerging domains. The most pronounced gaps exist in contextual and emerging areas. Survey participants ranked methodological rigidity, technology and data analytics gaps, and participatory engagement gaps as the most urgent areas for further inquiry. The findings highlight the necessity of inclusive and participatory approaches in futures studies. Concrete recommendations are proposed, such as enhancing methodological rigor, embracing diverse viewpoints, and utilizing new technologies. This work establishes a foundation for subsequent investigations and aims to support the ongoing evolution of the field.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.