Hypselostoma fruhstorferi Mollendorff 1897

Hypselostoma fruhstorferi Möllendorff, 1897 Figs 111 U, 138, 139, 140 Hypselostoma fruhstorferi Möllendorff, 1897: 70–71. Gyliauchen fruhstorferi — Pilsbry 1917: 217, pl. 37, figs 1–3; van Benthem Jutting 1950: 46. Gyliotrachela concreta van Benthem Jutting, 1949 a: 64–65, fig. 1. syn. nov. Gyliotrachela concreta — van Benthem Jutting 1950: 44. Gyliotrachela fruhstorferi — van Benthem Jutting 1952: 318; Zilch 1984: 165. Type material examined. Indonesia • lectotype of H. fruhstorferi; SMF 4580 • 5 paralectotypes of H. fruhstorferi; SMF 4581 • 16 paratypes of G. concreta; from the type locality; Sept. 1948; G. A. Tammes-Bolt leg.; RMNH. Moll. 137155. Additional material examined. Indonesia • 5 shells; Sulawesi, South-Sulawesi, Lemo SE of Rantepao; 700 m a. s. l.; May 1995; W. J. M. Maassen leg.; coll. PGB • 2 shells; Lesser Sunda islands, Rintja island, ca 1 mile S Rintja village, mouth of cave; Apr. 1994; W. Auffenberg leg.; UF 220736. Type localities. “ Java ” (Djampang, Java, Indonesia) (H. fruhstorferi); “ Sulawesi, Main road from Makalé to Kalossi, South Celebes, 700–800 m alt. ” (G. concreta). Differential diagnosis. This species is probably most similar to the geographically distant H. khaowongense and for differences, see under that species. Distribution. This species in known from Lesser Sunda islands, Java and Sulawesi islands, Indonesia. Remarks. Slightly variable smaller barriers. Some specimens of G. concreta had two and some three barriers between the lower palatal and columellar one. Interpalatal plica can be well developed or weaker. We observed no differences between the type specimens of G. concreta and H. fruhstorferi. Van Benthem Jutting (1949 a) compared the newly described G. concreta with H. fruhstorferi but her decision was based on variable characters such as the level of detachment of the last whorl, broadness of the last whorl (which is, by us, not observed as different between the types) and level of keel development (namely slightly weaker in G. concreta, but this difference is very slight). We treat all these differences as intraspecific variability.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15270825
Primary Topic
Marine Biology and Ecology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hypselostoma fruhstorferi Mollendorff 1897

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Marine Biology and Ecology Research
article

Hypselostoma fruhstorferi Mollendorff 1897

article en

Abstract

Hypselostoma fruhstorferi Möllendorff, 1897 Figs 111 U, 138, 139, 140 Hypselostoma fruhstorferi Möllendorff, 1897: 70–71. Gyliauchen fruhstorferi — Pilsbry 1917: 217, pl. 37, figs 1–3; van Benthem Jutting 1950: 46. Gyliotrachela concreta van Benthem Jutting, 1949 a: 64–65, fig. 1. syn. nov. Gyliotrachela concreta — van Benthem Jutting 1950: 44. Gyliotrachela fruhstorferi — van Benthem Jutting 1952: 318; Zilch 1984: 165. Type material examined. Indonesia • lectotype of H. fruhstorferi; SMF 4580 • 5 paralectotypes of H. fruhstorferi; SMF 4581 • 16 paratypes of G. concreta; from the type locality; Sept. 1948; G. A. Tammes-Bolt leg.; RMNH. Moll. 137155. Additional material examined. Indonesia • 5 shells; Sulawesi, South-Sulawesi, Lemo SE of Rantepao; 700 m a. s. l.; May 1995; W. J. M. Maassen leg.; coll. PGB • 2 shells; Lesser Sunda islands, Rintja island, ca 1 mile S Rintja village, mouth of cave; Apr. 1994; W. Auffenberg leg.; UF 220736. Type localities. “ Java ” (Djampang, Java, Indonesia) (H. fruhstorferi); “ Sulawesi, Main road from Makalé to Kalossi, South Celebes, 700–800 m alt. ” (G. concreta). Differential diagnosis. This species is probably most similar to the geographically distant H. khaowongense and for differences, see under that species. Distribution. This species in known from Lesser Sunda islands, Java and Sulawesi islands, Indonesia. Remarks. Slightly variable smaller barriers. Some specimens of G. concreta had two and some three barriers between the lower palatal and columellar one. Interpalatal plica can be well developed or weaker. We observed no differences between the type specimens of G. concreta and H. fruhstorferi. Van Benthem Jutting (1949 a) compared the newly described G. concreta with H. fruhstorferi but her decision was based on variable characters such as the level of detachment of the last whorl, broadness of the last whorl (which is, by us, not observed as different between the types) and level of keel development (namely slightly weaker in G. concreta, but this difference is very slight). We treat all these differences as intraspecific variability.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Florida Museum of Natural History (US), Chulalongkorn University (TH), University of Florida (US), University of Belgrade (RS), Institute of Materials and Environmental Chemistry (HU), Slovak Environmental Agency (SK), Széchenyi István University (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Marine Biology and Ecology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.