Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Small Group Discussions over Didactic Lecture in Neurophysiology among First Year Medical Students

Background and Objectives: Medical education continually seeks to optimize teaching methods to enhance learning outcomes. Students were heavily bombarded with many theory and practical classes. The objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of small group discussions versus traditional didactic lectures in neurophysiology among first-year medical students. Methods: 150 first-year medical students were recruited to participate in this study. The students were randomly divided into two groups of A and B of strength seventy-five in each group. “Physiology of Pain” was the topic selected. The topic was initially covered in a one-hour lecture session. Then both Group A and Group B underwent a pre-test using multiple-choice questions. Group B was further divided into five subgroups with one facilitator for each group. Group B students were engaged in interactive small group discussion sessions while Group A continued with didactic lectures as a whole group. Later, post test was conducted for both groups with the same MCQs to assess the understanding of concepts. Then feedback was taken by giving them a qualitative questionnaire to gauge student perception of the effectiveness towards SGD. Data were analyzed using SPSS 25 software. Results: The pre-test and post-test scores of Group A and Group B were compared. The post-test scores of Group A were compared to those of Group B. There was a significant improvement with post-test score in Group B, when compared with post-test score in Group A. Students had a favorable perception of small group discussion sessions. Conclusion: The study suggests that small group discussions may enhance immediate understanding and retention of neurophysiology concepts compared to didactic lectures among first-year medical students. These findings emphasize how interactive and collaborative learning methods can potentially benefit medical education.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14593310
Primary Topic
Fungal Infections and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Small Group Discussions over Didactic Lecture in Neurophysiology among First Year Medical Students

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Fungal Infections and Studies
article

Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Small Group Discussions over Didactic Lecture in Neurophysiology among First Year Medical Students

article en

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Medical education continually seeks to optimize teaching methods to enhance learning outcomes. Students were heavily bombarded with many theory and practical classes. The objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of small group discussions versus traditional didactic lectures in neurophysiology among first-year medical students. Methods: 150 first-year medical students were recruited to participate in this study. The students were randomly divided into two groups of A and B of strength seventy-five in each group. “Physiology of Pain” was the topic selected. The topic was initially covered in a one-hour lecture session. Then both Group A and Group B underwent a pre-test using multiple-choice questions. Group B was further divided into five subgroups with one facilitator for each group. Group B students were engaged in interactive small group discussion sessions while Group A continued with didactic lectures as a whole group. Later, post test was conducted for both groups with the same MCQs to assess the understanding of concepts. Then feedback was taken by giving them a qualitative questionnaire to gauge student perception of the effectiveness towards SGD. Data were analyzed using SPSS 25 software. Results: The pre-test and post-test scores of Group A and Group B were compared. The post-test scores of Group A were compared to those of Group B. There was a significant improvement with post-test score in Group B, when compared with post-test score in Group A. Students had a favorable perception of small group discussion sessions. Conclusion: The study suggests that small group discussions may enhance immediate understanding and retention of neurophysiology concepts compared to didactic lectures among first-year medical students. These findings emphasize how interactive and collaborative learning methods can potentially benefit medical education.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sri Gokulam Hospital (IN), Naval Science & Technological Laboratory (IN), Indian Institute of Management Visakhapatnam (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Fungal Infections and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.