Disentangling Sources of Uncertainty in CLM5 Model Predictions: Water, Energy, and Carbon Fluxes at European Observation Sites

This study evaluates the performance of the Community Land Model version 5 (CLM5) in simulating key ecosystem variables, including soil moisture (SM), evapotranspiration (ET), sensible heat flux (H), net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and gross primary production (GPP), using ensemble simulations across 14 European measurement sites. Key Highlights: Comprehensive Evaluation: The study dissects the influence of perturbed soil, vegetation, and atmospheric parameters on model outputs. Performance Metrics: Results show that CLM5 captured soil moisture variability well in most sites but struggled with carbon and energy fluxes, particularly in cold and boreal ecosystems. Uncertainty Quantification: Ensemble spread effectiveness was evaluated using metrics like Coverage Percentage (CP) and Spread-Skill Ratio (SS). Insights for Model Development: Key areas for improvement were identified as structural errors and parameterization gaps in CLM5, such as energy partitioning biases and underrepresentation of snow dynamics.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14204279
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disentangling Sources of Uncertainty in CLM5 Model Predictions: Water, Energy, and Carbon Fluxes at European Observation Sites

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Disentangling Sources of Uncertainty in CLM5 Model Predictions: Water, Energy, and Carbon Fluxes at European Observation Sites

article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of the Community Land Model version 5 (CLM5) in simulating key ecosystem variables, including soil moisture (SM), evapotranspiration (ET), sensible heat flux (H), net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and gross primary production (GPP), using ensemble simulations across 14 European measurement sites. Key Highlights: Comprehensive Evaluation: The study dissects the influence of perturbed soil, vegetation, and atmospheric parameters on model outputs. Performance Metrics: Results show that CLM5 captured soil moisture variability well in most sites but struggled with carbon and energy fluxes, particularly in cold and boreal ecosystems. Uncertainty Quantification: Ensemble spread effectiveness was evaluated using metrics like Coverage Percentage (CP) and Spread-Skill Ratio (SS). Insights for Model Development: Key areas for improvement were identified as structural errors and parameterization gaps in CLM5, such as energy partitioning biases and underrepresentation of snow dynamics.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Disentangling Sources of Uncertainty in CLM5 Model Predictions: Water, Energy, and Carbon Fluxes at European Observation Sites · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS