De-alienation as a qualitative measurement of development

The study of any phenomenon of reality involves the question of determining the nature of its process state, conditioned either by its development, or stagnation, or decay, or mutation. Defining the quality of this state, at that is important – as a process, impliesan appropriate system of criteria for measuring its quality. However, the nature of these criteria, unlike growth indicators, cannot be reduced to their formal expression; here a substantive measurement of the process state of the investigated reality is required.And this substantive measurement entails such a practical engagement with the process of reality development that frees it from dominant forms of alienation. This can only be achieved through the actual resolution of the social contradictions underlying theseforms. This is the essence of social creativity as the process of forming new social relations. Thus, the qualitative measurement of the process state of reality becomes a factor in its actual development. Correspondingly, this leads to the qualitative development of the researcher himself: from an analyst-observer to a subject of social creativity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13895635
Primary Topic
Psychology of Development and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

De-alienation as a qualitative measurement of development

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Psychology of Development and Education
article

De-alienation as a qualitative measurement of development

article en

Abstract

The study of any phenomenon of reality involves the question of determining the nature of its process state, conditioned either by its development, or stagnation, or decay, or mutation. Defining the quality of this state, at that is important – as a process, impliesan appropriate system of criteria for measuring its quality. However, the nature of these criteria, unlike growth indicators, cannot be reduced to their formal expression; here a substantive measurement of the process state of the investigated reality is required.And this substantive measurement entails such a practical engagement with the process of reality development that frees it from dominant forms of alienation. This can only be achieved through the actual resolution of the social contradictions underlying theseforms. This is the essence of social creativity as the process of forming new social relations. Thus, the qualitative measurement of the process state of reality becomes a factor in its actual development. Correspondingly, this leads to the qualitative development of the researcher himself: from an analyst-observer to a subject of social creativity.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Moscow State University (TJ)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Psychology of Development and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.