Artificial Intelligence: A Construct of Human Values (Exploring How Human Biases Are Reflected in AI)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly seen as a solution to societal challenges, praised for its efficiency, objectivity, and ability to make decisions free from human error. However, this perception obscures the reality that AI is deeply embedded with human values, reflecting the biases of its creators. This paper argues that AI systems, far from being neutral, are sociotechnical constructs influenced by the social, political, and cultural contexts in which they are developed. The article explores how human biases infiltrate AI through data selection, feature prioritization, and algorithmic design, often perpetuating systemic inequalities. It highlights real-world cases of biased AI outcomes across sectors such as healthcare, hiring, criminal justice, and education. Furthermore, the paper addresses the ethical and philosophical implications of these biases, examining the power dynamics thatinfluence AI development and the need for more inclusive and accountable design practices. By proposing strategies for mitigating bias, such as diverse development teams, transparency, and ethical frameworks, the paper aims to foster the creation of AI systems that serve the public good while ensuring fairness and equity.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15349193
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence: A Construct of Human Values (Exploring How Human Biases Are Reflected in AI)

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial Intelligence: A Construct of Human Values (Exploring How Human Biases Are Reflected in AI)

article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly seen as a solution to societal challenges, praised for its efficiency, objectivity, and ability to make decisions free from human error. However, this perception obscures the reality that AI is deeply embedded with human values, reflecting the biases of its creators. This paper argues that AI systems, far from being neutral, are sociotechnical constructs influenced by the social, political, and cultural contexts in which they are developed. The article explores how human biases infiltrate AI through data selection, feature prioritization, and algorithmic design, often perpetuating systemic inequalities. It highlights real-world cases of biased AI outcomes across sectors such as healthcare, hiring, criminal justice, and education. Furthermore, the paper addresses the ethical and philosophical implications of these biases, examining the power dynamics thatinfluence AI development and the need for more inclusive and accountable design practices. By proposing strategies for mitigating bias, such as diverse development teams, transparency, and ethical frameworks, the paper aims to foster the creation of AI systems that serve the public good while ensuring fairness and equity.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.