An Integrated Open Ecosystem: Whose Responsibility Is it?

Digital Cultural Heritage institutions want to be able to use open solutions for their digital infrastructure. However, the landscape of open-source and open-access components tends to be siloed, leaving it up to users to figure out how to put the pieces of the puzzle together. This can present a barrier to adoption of open infrastructure, especially when commercial providers claim to offer easy access to a complete interoperable ecosystem. With the number of priorities to consider when implementing software, interoperability often falls through the cracks or defaults to low priority because by its nature interoperability requires the participation of multiple entities. It's not always clear whose responsibility it is or why it matters. We will share observations on this topic from the perspective of the Lyrasis Research Infrastructure Communities and the Lyrasis Organizational Home for Community Supported Technologies, posing these questions for the wider open repository community to consider: (a) what role should individual communities play in creating a viable interconnected open ecosystem? (b) how can communities be accountable to each other to ensure that the ecosystem is created and is sustained?

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15758464
Primary Topic
Open Source Software Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Integrated Open Ecosystem: Whose Responsibility Is it?

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Open Source Software Innovations
article

An Integrated Open Ecosystem: Whose Responsibility Is it?

article en

Abstract

Digital Cultural Heritage institutions want to be able to use open solutions for their digital infrastructure. However, the landscape of open-source and open-access components tends to be siloed, leaving it up to users to figure out how to put the pieces of the puzzle together. This can present a barrier to adoption of open infrastructure, especially when commercial providers claim to offer easy access to a complete interoperable ecosystem. With the number of priorities to consider when implementing software, interoperability often falls through the cracks or defaults to low priority because by its nature interoperability requires the participation of multiple entities. It's not always clear whose responsibility it is or why it matters. We will share observations on this topic from the perspective of the Lyrasis Research Infrastructure Communities and the Lyrasis Organizational Home for Community Supported Technologies, posing these questions for the wider open repository community to consider: (a) what role should individual communities play in creating a viable interconnected open ecosystem? (b) how can communities be accountable to each other to ensure that the ecosystem is created and is sustained?

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Cambridge (GB), Lyrasis (US), DataCite (DE), California State University, San Bernardino (US), Indiana University (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Open Source Software Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Integrated Open Ecosystem: Whose Responsibility Is it? · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS