Interval Valued Fermatean Neutrosophic for Analysis Risk Management of Practical Teaching Quality in University Art and Design Programs

The quality of practical teaching in university art and design programs is a crucial determinant of students’ creative and professional development. However, various risks challenge the effectiveness of these programs, ranging from outdated curricula to inadequate resources and inconsistent evaluation methods. This paper explores a comprehensive risk management framework to enhance the quality of practical teaching in art and design education. It examines key factors such as faculty expertise, infrastructure, student engagement, and industry collaboration. Through a structured risk analysis, universities can develop proactive strategies to mitigate challenges, ensuring that students receive high-quality, relevant, and practical training. The study uses multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology with two methods. One method named Entropy method to compute the criteria weights, and another method named MAIRCA to rank the alternatives. These methods are used under the interval valued Fermatean neutrosophic sets to overcome uncertainty and vague information. An application is shown to show the validation of the proposed approach.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15122386
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interval Valued Fermatean Neutrosophic for Analysis Risk Management of Practical Teaching Quality in University Art and Design Programs

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Interval Valued Fermatean Neutrosophic for Analysis Risk Management of Practical Teaching Quality in University Art and Design Programs

article en

Abstract

The quality of practical teaching in university art and design programs is a crucial determinant of students’ creative and professional development. However, various risks challenge the effectiveness of these programs, ranging from outdated curricula to inadequate resources and inconsistent evaluation methods. This paper explores a comprehensive risk management framework to enhance the quality of practical teaching in art and design education. It examines key factors such as faculty expertise, infrastructure, student engagement, and industry collaboration. Through a structured risk analysis, universities can develop proactive strategies to mitigate challenges, ensuring that students receive high-quality, relevant, and practical training. The study uses multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology with two methods. One method named Entropy method to compute the criteria weights, and another method named MAIRCA to rank the alternatives. These methods are used under the interval valued Fermatean neutrosophic sets to overcome uncertainty and vague information. An application is shown to show the validation of the proposed approach.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.