Generative open graphic score #1

Generative open graphic score #1 is a work that uses the software program Touchdesigner to design and build generative processes that create an open graphic score/notation. In performance the digital score produces a plethora of graphic symbols—from simple ink blot-esque dots and abstract globular shapes to complex webs of broken grid patterns interacting with sharp and angular geometric shapes. The electroacoustic aspects of this work utilize mixer feedback. Mixer feedback is created when the inputs of the mixer are routed back into its outputs to create a (feedback) loop. Manipulating the mixer's, faders, dials, and buttons creates unpredictable electronic sounds ranging from simple and harmonious to chaotic and noisy. The setup for generative open graphic score #1 consists of an instrumentalist patched into a mixer with feedback loops being played by another performer. In this novel electroacoustic setup, the sounds, and timbres of the two instruments can clash and contrast or synthesize and melt together. In performance, the instrument patched into the mixer transmutes into a noise-laden super-instrument that in turn can mutate the behavior of the electronic sounds together with the mixer performer. I have dubbed this live electroacoustic system/process as 'Instrumentalist and Mixer Feedback Transmutation' (IMFT).

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15028121
Primary Topic
Music Technology and Sound Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative open graphic score #1

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Music Technology and Sound Studies
article

Generative open graphic score #1

article en

Abstract

Generative open graphic score #1 is a work that uses the software program Touchdesigner to design and build generative processes that create an open graphic score/notation. In performance the digital score produces a plethora of graphic symbols—from simple ink blot-esque dots and abstract globular shapes to complex webs of broken grid patterns interacting with sharp and angular geometric shapes. The electroacoustic aspects of this work utilize mixer feedback. Mixer feedback is created when the inputs of the mixer are routed back into its outputs to create a (feedback) loop. Manipulating the mixer's, faders, dials, and buttons creates unpredictable electronic sounds ranging from simple and harmonious to chaotic and noisy. The setup for generative open graphic score #1 consists of an instrumentalist patched into a mixer with feedback loops being played by another performer. In this novel electroacoustic setup, the sounds, and timbres of the two instruments can clash and contrast or synthesize and melt together. In performance, the instrument patched into the mixer transmutes into a noise-laden super-instrument that in turn can mutate the behavior of the electronic sounds together with the mixer performer. I have dubbed this live electroacoustic system/process as 'Instrumentalist and Mixer Feedback Transmutation' (IMFT).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Music Technology and Sound Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.