Towards a Living Labs research agenda

This paper proposes a research agenda for Living Labs as after 20 years of Living Lab-practice, theory building is not up to par with the steady growth and expansion of practice in terms of topics, sectors and sheer number of practitioners and initiatives. By means of a literature review, a workshop with the Living Lab research community (N=60) and a self-assessment of Living Labs on key topics (N=70) we were able to identify the following main action points to be tackled by future Living Lab research: 1. Linking the different levels of Living Labs to existing theories and literature streams; 2. Approaches to increase impact, value creation & scaling of Living Labs; 3. Harmonization & differentiation of Living Labs; 4. Long(er)-term user & stakeholder involvement; 5. Inclusive involvement. Especially in terms of impact, there is a big demand from practitioners’ perspective which could be addressed by first emphasizing the harmonisation process of the different Living Labs elements and terminology and subsequently theorising and conceptualising the current diversity in terms of themes and topics.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15729482
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a Living Labs research agenda

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
article

Towards a Living Labs research agenda

article en

Abstract

This paper proposes a research agenda for Living Labs as after 20 years of Living Lab-practice, theory building is not up to par with the steady growth and expansion of practice in terms of topics, sectors and sheer number of practitioners and initiatives. By means of a literature review, a workshop with the Living Lab research community (N=60) and a self-assessment of Living Labs on key topics (N=70) we were able to identify the following main action points to be tackled by future Living Lab research: 1. Linking the different levels of Living Labs to existing theories and literature streams; 2. Approaches to increase impact, value creation & scaling of Living Labs; 3. Harmonization & differentiation of Living Labs; 4. Long(er)-term user & stakeholder involvement; 5. Inclusive involvement. Especially in terms of impact, there is a big demand from practitioners’ perspective which could be addressed by first emphasizing the harmonisation process of the different Living Labs elements and terminology and subsequently theorising and conceptualising the current diversity in terms of themes and topics.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), Luleå University of Technology (SE), Utrecht University (NL), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Czech Academy of Sciences, Economics Institute (CZ), European Network of Living Labs (BE), Laurea University of Applied Sciences (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards a Living Labs research agenda · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS