FRACTURES OF THE CALCANEUS: ETIOLOGY, PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, EPIDEMIOLOGY, CLASSIFICATION AND DIAGNOSIS

Objectives. To review current concepts regarding etiology, pathophysiology, epidemiology, classification, and diagnosis of patients with intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Methods. Literary sources from PubMed, Hinari, SpringerLink, National Center of Biotechnology Information, and Medline databases were studied regarding etiology, pathophysiology, epidemiology, classification, and diagnosis of calcaneal fractures, using the keywords: "intraarticular calcaneal fractures", "etiology", "pathophysiology", "epidemiology", "classification", and "diagnosis", with 25 relevant bibliographic sources selected representative for the materials published on the topic of this review article. Results. Calcaneal fractures constitute approximately 1-2% of the total number of fractures and approximately 60% of tarsal fractures in adults. About 60-75% of calcaneal fractures are intraarticular involving the posterior facet of the calcaneus, 5-10% of cases are bilateral, and less than 10% are open. The main causes that determine calcaneal fractures are: falls from height and landing on heels with axial loading of the bone (60%), road traffic accidents, stress fractures in athletes, direct trauma at the calcaneal level. Most frequently (80-90%), calcaneal fractures occur in men aged between 20 and 45 years, with predilection (70%) in industrial workers during work. In women, the maximum incidence of these fractures is observed at the age of 60-70 years. Although there are several classifications of calcaneal fractures based on different criteria (Bohler, 1931; Crosby and Fitzgibbons, 1990; Eastwood, 1993; Zwipp, 1993), the most frequently used classification systems are Sanders (1993) based on coronal computed tomography imaging and Essex-Lopresti (1952) based on lateral radiography. Conclusions. The diagnosis of calcaneal fracture is based on medical history, clinical examination, and imaging investigations. Medical history reveals the mechanism of fracture production, debut symptomatology, and associated conditions. Clinical examination highlights fracture signs and fracture type. Ankle and foot radiography in anteroposterior, lateral, oblique, Harris-type, and Broden-type views reveals fracture lines, calcaneal deformation, and severity of adjacent lesions. Computed tomography provides detailed images of the lesion, better visualization and characterization of the subtalar joint, fracture lines and displaced fragments, obtaining classification criteria for severity, subsequent evaluation, and treatment planning.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15880677
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FRACTURES OF THE CALCANEUS: ETIOLOGY, PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, EPIDEMIOLOGY, CLASSIFICATION AND DIAGNOSIS

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

FRACTURES OF THE CALCANEUS: ETIOLOGY, PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, EPIDEMIOLOGY, CLASSIFICATION AND DIAGNOSIS

article en

Abstract

Objectives. To review current concepts regarding etiology, pathophysiology, epidemiology, classification, and diagnosis of patients with intraarticular calcaneal fractures. Methods. Literary sources from PubMed, Hinari, SpringerLink, National Center of Biotechnology Information, and Medline databases were studied regarding etiology, pathophysiology, epidemiology, classification, and diagnosis of calcaneal fractures, using the keywords: "intraarticular calcaneal fractures", "etiology", "pathophysiology", "epidemiology", "classification", and "diagnosis", with 25 relevant bibliographic sources selected representative for the materials published on the topic of this review article. Results. Calcaneal fractures constitute approximately 1-2% of the total number of fractures and approximately 60% of tarsal fractures in adults. About 60-75% of calcaneal fractures are intraarticular involving the posterior facet of the calcaneus, 5-10% of cases are bilateral, and less than 10% are open. The main causes that determine calcaneal fractures are: falls from height and landing on heels with axial loading of the bone (60%), road traffic accidents, stress fractures in athletes, direct trauma at the calcaneal level. Most frequently (80-90%), calcaneal fractures occur in men aged between 20 and 45 years, with predilection (70%) in industrial workers during work. In women, the maximum incidence of these fractures is observed at the age of 60-70 years. Although there are several classifications of calcaneal fractures based on different criteria (Bohler, 1931; Crosby and Fitzgibbons, 1990; Eastwood, 1993; Zwipp, 1993), the most frequently used classification systems are Sanders (1993) based on coronal computed tomography imaging and Essex-Lopresti (1952) based on lateral radiography. Conclusions. The diagnosis of calcaneal fracture is based on medical history, clinical examination, and imaging investigations. Medical history reveals the mechanism of fracture production, debut symptomatology, and associated conditions. Clinical examination highlights fracture signs and fracture type. Ankle and foot radiography in anteroposterior, lateral, oblique, Harris-type, and Broden-type views reveals fracture lines, calcaneal deformation, and severity of adjacent lesions. Computed tomography provides detailed images of the lesion, better visualization and characterization of the subtalar joint, fracture lines and displaced fragments, obtaining classification criteria for severity, subsequent evaluation, and treatment planning.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy (MD), Institute of Chemistry (MD)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.