Centistidea Rohwer 1914

Genus Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 Centistidea Rohwer, 1914: 81; Chen et al. 1997: 317; van Achterberg and Mehrnejad 2002: 32; Ranjith, 2019: 410; Ranjith, 2023: 452. Type species: Centistidea ectoeaemiae Rohwer,1914, by original designation. Mirax – subgenus Centistidea: Papp 2013: 97. Mirax Haliday, 1833: Muesebeck 1922: 10; Cauich-Kumul et al. 2014: 903; Slater-Baker et al. 2022: 55, syn. by Liu and Polaszek 2024: 289. Generic rediagnosis Antenna with flagellomeres longer than wide or as long as wide, sometimes with acute tooth ventro-apically on 5 th flagellomere (Figure 1 (d)); head wider than long in dorsal view; face more or less convex medially with or without medial longitudinal carina anteriorly; frons smooth or granulate, convex medially, rarely with mid longitudinal carina; vertex smooth; mesoscutum smooth to shallowly punctate, sometimes with longitudinal carina laterally or raised carinae behind tegula (Figure 6 (e)); notauli shallowly to distinctly impressed anteriorly (Figure 4 (e)); scutellar sulcus indistinct to distinct, with (Figure 6 (g)) or without (Figure 2 (e)) crenulation; scutellum smooth to weakly punctate, posterior depressions often medium-sized to large (Figure 4 (g)), rarely obsolescent, touching (Figure 7 (e)) to widely removed from each other (Figure 6 (g)); propodeum with a strong median carina (Figure 2 (f)), if rarely largely absent then antero-medially rugose; vein r obsolescent to distinct (Figure 1 (g)); vein 1-R1 absent or distinctly vein-like or triangular (Figure 2 (g)), short of reaching the length of pterostigma (Figure 3 (f)); tarsal claw with or without basal lobe; T1 indistinctly to distinctly constricted to apex posterior to its apical widest part (Figure 1 (k)); T2 short (Figure 1 (k)) to very long at base (Figure 2 (k)); T3 often entirely longitudinally striate (Figure 1 (k)); ovipositor sheath often around (0.5 to 1.5 ×) the length of hind basitartus, with long hairs more on apical part (Figure 3 (e)). Biology Koinobiont endoparasitoids of Microlepidoptera (Nepticulidae, Acanthopteroctetidae, Gracillariidae, Heliozelidae, Tineidae, Cosmopterigidae, Tischeriidae, Lyonetiidae) and Diptera (Agromyzidae) (Ranjith et al. 2019). Distribution Afrotropical, Nearctic, Neotropical, Oceanic, Oriental and Palaearctic (Yu et al. 2016; Ghramh et al. 2019; Liu and Polaszek 2024). Notes Centistidea can be separated from the other two genera of Miracinae combining presence of a longitudinal carina or rugosity medially connected to more or less developed costulae on propodeum with more developed notauli for practical use. Key to species of genus Centistidea Rohwer from Borneo 1. Median carina of propodeum present behind level of costulae and reaching posterior transverse carina of propodeum (eg Figure 1 (j)) ..................................................................... 2 – Median carina of propodeum absent behind level of costulae (eg Figure 6 (h)) ........ 4 2. Body distinctly pale yellow (Figure 3 (a)); vein 1-R1 slightly longer than pterostigma length (Figure 3 (f)); T3 not longitudinally striate (Figure 3 (i)).................................................. .............................................................................. C. longimetacarpa Liu and Polaszek, sp. n. – Body brown (eg Figure 1 (a)); vein 1-R1 shorter than pterostigma length (eg Figure 1 (g)); T3 longitudinally striate (eg Figure 1 (k))............................................................................................ 3 3. Hind depressions on scutellum oval (Figure 1 (j)); junction of propodeal costula pointed anteriorly (Figure 1 (j)); 5 th flagellomere with acute tooth ventral-apically (Figure 1 (d)) ............................ ............................ C. albantennalis Liu and Polaszek, sp. n. – Hind depressions on scutellum oblong (Figure 4 (g)); propodeal costula perpendicular to median longitudinal carina (Figure 4 (g)); 5 th flagellomere without acute tooth ventral-apically (Figure 4 (d)) .......................... C. paracarinata Liu and Polaszek, sp. n. 4. Head distinctly bulged behind eyes in dorsal view (Figure 7 (b)); head abruptly raised behind hind ocelli in lateral view (Figure 7 (f)); vein 1-M shorter, thus first discal cell of fore wing nearly quadrate (Figure 7 (g)).................. C. tumida Liu and Polaszek, sp. n. – Head more or less constricted behind eyes in dorsal view (eg Figure 6 (b)); head flat behind hind ocelli in lateral view (eg Figure 2 (a)); vein 1-M distinctly longer, thus first discal cell of fore wing not quadrate (eg Figure 2g).............................................................. 5 5. Areas behind tegula on mesonotum distinct raised as a carina (Figure 6 (f)); scutellar hind depressions separated from each other by half of its minor axis (Figure 6 (h)); scutellar sulcus broadly crenulated (Figure 6 (g)).......................................................................... ........................................................................................... C. scapularis Liu and Polaszek, sp. n. – Areas behind tegula on mesonotum not raised (eg Figure 2 (e)); scutellar hind depressions touching each other (eg Figure 2 (f)); scutellar sulcus not crenulated (eg Figure 2 (e)) .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 6. T2 distinctly longer (about as long as wide) and narrow anteriorly (Figure 2 (k)); vein 1- R1 less than half length of pterostigma (Figure 2 (g)); length of eye 4.8 × as long as temple in dorsal view (Figure 2 (b))............ ............ C. bulbosa Liu and Polaszek, sp. n. – T2 wider, at least 2 × wider than median length and wider anteriorly (Figure 5 (j)); vein 1-R1 over half length of pterostigma (Figure 5 (g)); length of eye at most 2.9 × as long as temple in dorsal view (Figure 5 (b))..................................................................................... ......................................................................... C. rugator Ranjith and van Achterberg, 2019