Buyda neotropica

Buyda neotropica (Navás) Fig. 14 Mantispa neotropica Navás, 1933: 309. Lectotype: male (MNHN). Type locality: French Guiana: Nouveau Chantier. Notes. The status of this species is very similar to M. confluens. In the original description, Navás (1933) mentioned a female and presented two illustrations: the pronotum and the tip of a forewing. After that, the name was listed by Penny (1977) and included in the catalogue by Ohl (2004). Tauber et al. (2017) stated that although Navás (1933) explicitly mentioned a single female, they could locate a single male only in the MNHN. According to their interpretation, it is unclear if Navás had more than one specimen, but he might also have indicated the wrong sex of the holotype. Tauber et al. (2017) designated the single male specimen in the MNHN as the lectotype. Later, Snyman et al. (2018) transferred the species to Buyda without any explicit justification, and finally Ardila-Camacho et al. (2018) synonymized the species under B. phthisica (Gerstaecker), but without studying the type. After analyzing the lectotype, we herein confirm the synonymy proposed by Ardila-Camacho et al. (2018). The lectotype of M. neotropica has all the major characters of B. phthisica, and the description and figures presented by Navás (1933) also matches with B. phthisica.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15731266
Primary Topic
Fossil Insects in Amber
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Buyda neotropica

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Fossil Insects in Amber
article

Buyda neotropica

article en

Abstract

Buyda neotropica (Navás) Fig. 14 Mantispa neotropica Navás, 1933: 309. Lectotype: male (MNHN). Type locality: French Guiana: Nouveau Chantier. Notes. The status of this species is very similar to M. confluens. In the original description, Navás (1933) mentioned a female and presented two illustrations: the pronotum and the tip of a forewing. After that, the name was listed by Penny (1977) and included in the catalogue by Ohl (2004). Tauber et al. (2017) stated that although Navás (1933) explicitly mentioned a single female, they could locate a single male only in the MNHN. According to their interpretation, it is unclear if Navás had more than one specimen, but he might also have indicated the wrong sex of the holotype. Tauber et al. (2017) designated the single male specimen in the MNHN as the lectotype. Later, Snyman et al. (2018) transferred the species to Buyda without any explicit justification, and finally Ardila-Camacho et al. (2018) synonymized the species under B. phthisica (Gerstaecker), but without studying the type. After analyzing the lectotype, we herein confirm the synonymy proposed by Ardila-Camacho et al. (2018). The lectotype of M. neotropica has all the major characters of B. phthisica, and the description and figures presented by Navás (1933) also matches with B. phthisica.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Museum für Naturkunde (DE), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Fossil Insects in Amber
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.