AI Matters: Debunking the Myth that AI Hinders the Creative Process

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education creative writing courses effects leaners’ imagination and critical thinking skills. A prevalent view regarding use of AI is that AI diminishes creativity and struggles to accurately capture diversity. This study aims to challenge that view. It considers AI as a collaborator that improves interaction with multicultural stories, such as the “AI Enchantment” course component where students employed AI to retell traditional fairy tales while addressing more complex socio-political issues related to gender, power, and culture. The design used was qualitative, where a sample of 30 undergraduate students from different faculties had enrolled. Methods of data collection involved students’ reflections, questionnaires, focus group discussions, and the comparison of texts written by AI and students. Thematic analysis was performed to explore students' preferences between their original stories and the AI-generated versions. Students first submitted their original stories, after which AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini were used to rewrite and improve the original versions. The students analyzed both their original stories and the AI-assisted versions, providing reasons for their preference of one over the other. Results confirm that AI helped students brainstorm and synthesize ideas, in narrative construction, enabling them to experiment with creativity. However, concerns were raised regarding AI's inability to emote, the overreliance on AI tools, and various ethical issues. Some students embraced the use of AI, arguing that it enhances creativity, while others felt it restricts creative expression. The research concludes that a blended approach to instruction is necessary, integrating AI with human creativity. It also provides guidance for educators, researchers, and policymakers on how to harness AI effectively while preserving student autonomy and encouraging critical engagement in creative writing.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16108601
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Matters: Debunking the Myth that AI Hinders the Creative Process

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

AI Matters: Debunking the Myth that AI Hinders the Creative Process

article en

Abstract

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education creative writing courses effects leaners’ imagination and critical thinking skills. A prevalent view regarding use of AI is that AI diminishes creativity and struggles to accurately capture diversity. This study aims to challenge that view. It considers AI as a collaborator that improves interaction with multicultural stories, such as the “AI Enchantment” course component where students employed AI to retell traditional fairy tales while addressing more complex socio-political issues related to gender, power, and culture. The design used was qualitative, where a sample of 30 undergraduate students from different faculties had enrolled. Methods of data collection involved students’ reflections, questionnaires, focus group discussions, and the comparison of texts written by AI and students. Thematic analysis was performed to explore students' preferences between their original stories and the AI-generated versions. Students first submitted their original stories, after which AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini were used to rewrite and improve the original versions. The students analyzed both their original stories and the AI-assisted versions, providing reasons for their preference of one over the other. Results confirm that AI helped students brainstorm and synthesize ideas, in narrative construction, enabling them to experiment with creativity. However, concerns were raised regarding AI's inability to emote, the overreliance on AI tools, and various ethical issues. Some students embraced the use of AI, arguing that it enhances creativity, while others felt it restricts creative expression. The research concludes that a blended approach to instruction is necessary, integrating AI with human creativity. It also provides guidance for educators, researchers, and policymakers on how to harness AI effectively while preserving student autonomy and encouraging critical engagement in creative writing.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Forman Christian College (PK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.