Another Test for The General Love System in the Society

Restoring the givers and NOT the takers is the most effective strategy, among all in the society as it will encourage the number of love interactions, according to the definition of the general love framework. This may be supplemented with limited punishments for the takers once they surpass a certain thresholds with almost no contribution to the others. But these punishments only account for less than 10% of the overall restoration resources for the givers and less than 5 percent of the number of restorations. Note punishment alone, even three times more frequent to the takers with no restoration to the givers would result in a lower mean and larger disparity in the population.So it seems that love really counts! The simulation is over-simplied as it only includes one dimension and also assumes everyone could contribute equally. In reality, it may be practical to enforce restoration of givers such as ME according to peers, e.g. similar backgrounds and experiences to prevent excessive exploitation or slavery! Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14561436
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Another Test for The General Love System in the Society

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
article

Another Test for The General Love System in the Society

article en

Abstract

Restoring the givers and NOT the takers is the most effective strategy, among all in the society as it will encourage the number of love interactions, according to the definition of the general love framework. This may be supplemented with limited punishments for the takers once they surpass a certain thresholds with almost no contribution to the others. But these punishments only account for less than 10% of the overall restoration resources for the givers and less than 5 percent of the number of restorations. Note punishment alone, even three times more frequent to the takers with no restoration to the givers would result in a lower mean and larger disparity in the population.So it seems that love really counts! The simulation is over-simplied as it only includes one dimension and also assumes everyone could contribute equally. In reality, it may be practical to enforce restoration of givers such as ME according to peers, e.g. similar backgrounds and experiences to prevent excessive exploitation or slavery! Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
FlyingBinary (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.