Rhinophrus Hsiao 1944

Genus Rhinophrus Hsiao, 1944 Rhinophrus Hsiao, 1944: 382. Rhinophrus – Carvalho 1957: 33 (catalog). — Gorczyca 1994: 181 (discussion); 1996: 332 (discussion); 2000: 49 (list); 2006: 66 (catalog). — Schuh 1995: 37 (catalog); 2002–2013 (online catalog). non Acrorrhinium Noualhier, 1895 – Gorczyca 1994: 181. Diagnosis Easily distinguished from other cylapines by the following combination of characters: body strongly elongate (Figs 35, 43); head with protruding, pointed frons and compressed clypeus (Figs 43–45); procoxae much longer than meso- and metacoxae (Fig. 44); scent gland efferent system weakly developed, restricted to posterior angle of metepisternum (Fig. 46); central row of tiles on pretarsal unguitractor absent (Fig. 47). Remarks As misplaced previously under a unique hallodapine genus Acrorrhinium (Gorczyca 1994), Rhinophrus is characterized primarily by the remarkably slender body shape (Fig. 43) and a projection on the frons (Fig 44). However, the plausible systematic position of Rhinophorus is yet to be determined (see Discussion below).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15297391
Primary Topic
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rhinophrus Hsiao 1944

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
article

Rhinophrus Hsiao 1944

article en

Abstract

Genus Rhinophrus Hsiao, 1944 Rhinophrus Hsiao, 1944: 382. Rhinophrus – Carvalho 1957: 33 (catalog). — Gorczyca 1994: 181 (discussion); 1996: 332 (discussion); 2000: 49 (list); 2006: 66 (catalog). — Schuh 1995: 37 (catalog); 2002–2013 (online catalog). non Acrorrhinium Noualhier, 1895 – Gorczyca 1994: 181. Diagnosis Easily distinguished from other cylapines by the following combination of characters: body strongly elongate (Figs 35, 43); head with protruding, pointed frons and compressed clypeus (Figs 43–45); procoxae much longer than meso- and metacoxae (Fig. 44); scent gland efferent system weakly developed, restricted to posterior angle of metepisternum (Fig. 46); central row of tiles on pretarsal unguitractor absent (Fig. 47). Remarks As misplaced previously under a unique hallodapine genus Acrorrhinium (Gorczyca 1994), Rhinophrus is characterized primarily by the remarkably slender body shape (Fig. 43) and a projection on the frons (Fig 44). However, the plausible systematic position of Rhinophorus is yet to be determined (see Discussion below).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Opole (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.