A Computational Tool for Local Gravimetric Geoid Determination Using Least Squares Collocation

<p><em><span>This study presents a computational tool (TUIDOTA), for determining local gravimetric geoids using Least Squares Collocation (LSC) techniques, essential for geodetic applications. The geoid provides a reference surface for determining the height of the earth's surface. The study focuses on evaluating the potential of the tool within Akure South Local Government Area in Ondo State of Nigeria, representing mountainous terrains. High-quality terrestrial gravity data, geopotential, and digital elevation models were used. The developed tool facilitates the selection between SLSC and NSLSC, making computations and output visualization straightforward. Results included geoidal undulations, processing time, and geoidal maps. For the pairwise comparisons of geoidal undulation, this indicates that the difference between (SLSC) and (NSLSC) techniques is not statistically significant, having a mean difference of -0.020m (SE = 0.036m, p = 0.567) and a 95% confidence interval of [-0.090m, 0.049m]. This result remains consistent under a 99.9% confidence interval, which spans [-0.137m, 0.097m]. However, for processing time, there exists a highly significant difference between the two techniques. The SLSC technique was 30.459 seconds faster than the NSLSC (SE = 0.000, p = < 0.001) , with a confidence interval of [-30.459, -30.459] in terms of both 95% and 99.9% levels. </span></em><em><span>Also, using the GGM dataset for both approaches, the standard deviations for both approaches yielded 1.538476m and 1.538454m respectively. Furthermore, using <a name="_Hlk164927336"></a>the DEM dataset for both approaches, the standard deviations for both approaches yielded 0.943200m and 0.</span></em><em><span>943198</span></em><em><span>m respectively. </span></em><em><span>TUIDOTA proved to be effective, accurate, economical, and user-friendly, and it is hereby recommended for local geoid determination.</span></em></p>

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14961951
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Computational Tool for Local Gravimetric Geoid Determination Using Least Squares Collocation

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
article

A Computational Tool for Local Gravimetric Geoid Determination Using Least Squares Collocation

article en

Abstract

<p><em><span>This study presents a computational tool (TUIDOTA), for determining local gravimetric geoids using Least Squares Collocation (LSC) techniques, essential for geodetic applications. The geoid provides a reference surface for determining the height of the earth's surface. The study focuses on evaluating the potential of the tool within Akure South Local Government Area in Ondo State of Nigeria, representing mountainous terrains. High-quality terrestrial gravity data, geopotential, and digital elevation models were used. The developed tool facilitates the selection between SLSC and NSLSC, making computations and output visualization straightforward. Results included geoidal undulations, processing time, and geoidal maps. For the pairwise comparisons of geoidal undulation, this indicates that the difference between (SLSC) and (NSLSC) techniques is not statistically significant, having a mean difference of -0.020m (SE = 0.036m, p = 0.567) and a 95% confidence interval of [-0.090m, 0.049m]. This result remains consistent under a 99.9% confidence interval, which spans [-0.137m, 0.097m]. However, for processing time, there exists a highly significant difference between the two techniques. The SLSC technique was 30.459 seconds faster than the NSLSC (SE = 0.000, p = < 0.001) , with a confidence interval of [-30.459, -30.459] in terms of both 95% and 99.9% levels. </span></em><em><span>Also, using the GGM dataset for both approaches, the standard deviations for both approaches yielded 1.538476m and 1.538454m respectively. Furthermore, using <a name="_Hlk164927336"></a>the DEM dataset for both approaches, the standard deviations for both approaches yielded 0.943200m and 0.</span></em><em><span>943198</span></em><em><span>m respectively. </span></em><em><span>TUIDOTA proved to be effective, accurate, economical, and user-friendly, and it is hereby recommended for local geoid determination.</span></em></p>

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.