Hidden in Plain Sight: Why Major Events Can Fail Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Communities

Major events are frequently championed as engines of economic growth, urban renewal, and global prestige. Yet beneath the surface of celebration lies a persistent inequity: socioeconomically disadvantaged communities can often experience minimal, if any, lasting benefit. This article explores how major events—such as the Olympic Games and Commonwealth Games—can reinforce structural inequalities by excluding marginalized groups from planning processes, displacing residents through gentrification, and offering only short-term, precarious employment opportunities. Drawing on examples from London 2012 and Birmingham 2022, the article examines who benefits, who remains neglected, and how legacy promises often fall short. It argues for a more strategic, inclusive, and data-informed approach that embeds social equity into the DNA of event planning. Practical recommendations are offered to ensure major events deliver measurable, long-term benefits for all communities—not just the privileged few. By doing so, host cities can turn symbolic gestures of inclusion into meaningful, systemic change.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15081364
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hidden in Plain Sight: Why Major Events Can Fail Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Communities

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
article

Hidden in Plain Sight: Why Major Events Can Fail Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Communities

article en

Abstract

Major events are frequently championed as engines of economic growth, urban renewal, and global prestige. Yet beneath the surface of celebration lies a persistent inequity: socioeconomically disadvantaged communities can often experience minimal, if any, lasting benefit. This article explores how major events—such as the Olympic Games and Commonwealth Games—can reinforce structural inequalities by excluding marginalized groups from planning processes, displacing residents through gentrification, and offering only short-term, precarious employment opportunities. Drawing on examples from London 2012 and Birmingham 2022, the article examines who benefits, who remains neglected, and how legacy promises often fall short. It argues for a more strategic, inclusive, and data-informed approach that embeds social equity into the DNA of event planning. Practical recommendations are offered to ensure major events deliver measurable, long-term benefits for all communities—not just the privileged few. By doing so, host cities can turn symbolic gestures of inclusion into meaningful, systemic change.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.