Comparative Study of Ultrasound and CT Imaging in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Adults

Background: Acute appendicitis is a common surgical combination, and accurateimaging is decisive for diagnosis. This read compares the characteristic truth ofultrasound (US) and calculated imaging (CT) imagery in inch-big patients presentingwith symptoms indicative of keen appendicitis.Methods: A prospective study wasconducted on 100 adult patients (50 males and 50 females) with a mean age of 35 years(range: 18-60 years). Apiece diligent underwent both ultrasound (US) and cat imagery.The diagnostic Precision sensitivity specificity positive foretelling value (PPV) andnegative foretelling value (NPV) of both imaging modalities were calculated andcompared.Results: Ultrasound: Sensitivity: 75%, Specificity: 85%, PPV: 81%, NPV:80%, Accuracy: 79%. CT: Sensitivity: 94%, Specificity: 90%, PPV: 92%, NPV: 93%,Accuracy: 92%. CT imaging demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (p<0.05)compared to ultrasound, with no significant difference in specificity (p>0.05).Conclusion: CT is more accurate and sensitive for diagnosing acute appendicitis inadults, making it the preferred modality in equivocal cases

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13991195
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Ultrasound and CT Imaging in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Adults

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

Comparative Study of Ultrasound and CT Imaging in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Adults

article en

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis is a common surgical combination, and accurateimaging is decisive for diagnosis. This read compares the characteristic truth ofultrasound (US) and calculated imaging (CT) imagery in inch-big patients presentingwith symptoms indicative of keen appendicitis.Methods: A prospective study wasconducted on 100 adult patients (50 males and 50 females) with a mean age of 35 years(range: 18-60 years). Apiece diligent underwent both ultrasound (US) and cat imagery.The diagnostic Precision sensitivity specificity positive foretelling value (PPV) andnegative foretelling value (NPV) of both imaging modalities were calculated andcompared.Results: Ultrasound: Sensitivity: 75%, Specificity: 85%, PPV: 81%, NPV:80%, Accuracy: 79%. CT: Sensitivity: 94%, Specificity: 90%, PPV: 92%, NPV: 93%,Accuracy: 92%. CT imaging demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (p<0.05)compared to ultrasound, with no significant difference in specificity (p>0.05).Conclusion: CT is more accurate and sensitive for diagnosing acute appendicitis inadults, making it the preferred modality in equivocal cases

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.