Pressure Recovery Downstream of Disturbances in Closed Conduit Systems

Pressure recovery in closed conduit systems is essential for optimizing hydraulic efficiency and accurate flow regulation. This study experimentally investigates pressure recovery distances downstream of control valves, flow meters, and orifice plates using a 2-inch stainless steel test bench with pressure taps at 2D intervals up to 26D. Devices tested include orifice plates (β = 0.3-0.8), a Venturi meter, a butterfly valve, and a gate valve across multiple flow conditions. Results indicate that while industry standards (ANSI/ISA-75.02) recommend measuring pressure at 6D downstream, pressure recovery typically occurs within 4D to 6D, varying based on flow conditions and device geometry. Higher beta ratio orifice plates and Venturi meters exhibited fasterrecovery, while more restrictive devices, such as partially closed throttling valves, exhibited longer recovery distances. This study also examines the distinction between Cv-based pressure loss and permanent pressure loss, demonstrating a strong correlation between energy dissipation and the loss coefficient (K). These findings provide critical insights into optimizing pressure measurement locations, improving pipeline efficiency, and refining engineering assumptions related to pressure loss assessments in fluid transport systems

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15207849
Primary Topic
Water Systems and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pressure Recovery Downstream of Disturbances in Closed Conduit Systems

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Water Systems and Optimization
article

Pressure Recovery Downstream of Disturbances in Closed Conduit Systems

article en

Abstract

Pressure recovery in closed conduit systems is essential for optimizing hydraulic efficiency and accurate flow regulation. This study experimentally investigates pressure recovery distances downstream of control valves, flow meters, and orifice plates using a 2-inch stainless steel test bench with pressure taps at 2D intervals up to 26D. Devices tested include orifice plates (β = 0.3-0.8), a Venturi meter, a butterfly valve, and a gate valve across multiple flow conditions. Results indicate that while industry standards (ANSI/ISA-75.02) recommend measuring pressure at 6D downstream, pressure recovery typically occurs within 4D to 6D, varying based on flow conditions and device geometry. Higher beta ratio orifice plates and Venturi meters exhibited fasterrecovery, while more restrictive devices, such as partially closed throttling valves, exhibited longer recovery distances. This study also examines the distinction between Cv-based pressure loss and permanent pressure loss, demonstrating a strong correlation between energy dissipation and the loss coefficient (K). These findings provide critical insights into optimizing pressure measurement locations, improving pipeline efficiency, and refining engineering assumptions related to pressure loss assessments in fluid transport systems

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Water Systems and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.