Portunoidea Rafinesque 1815

Superfamily Portunoidea Rafinesque, 1815 Remarks: While the taxonomy of Portunoidea has previously been well studied, the phylogenetic relationships between the various groups now in the superfamily have been less settled with different systems being proposed (e.g., see like Schubart and Reuschel (2009) and Spiridonov et al. (2014). N. Evans (2018), based on morphological and molecular evidence, only recognized Geryonidae Colosi, 1924, Carcinidae MacLeay, 1838 and Portunidae Rafinesque, 1815 under the Portunoidea, leaving the status of one family, Brusiniidae Števčić, 1991 unresolved (but see Spiridonov 2020). We retain the Brusiniidae in the Portunoidea until more studies can be done. We follow Spiridonov et al. (2014) in recognizing the Podophthalminae Dana, 1851 and Lupocyclinae Alcock, 1899 as subfamilies under the Portunidae, and elevating Monomia Gistel, 1848 and Xiphonectes A. Milne-Edwards, 1873, to full genera; and N. Evans (2018) in recognizing Goniosupradens Davie & Ng, 2024 as full genus, and Thranita Evans, 2018 for members of the “ Thalamita prymna group”. In the Portuninae, the genera Portunus, Monomia and Xiphonectes had been shown to be composite (N. Evans 2018), many were resolved by Koch et al. (2022). For taxa treated herein, several species previously placed under Xiphonectes have recently been placed in new genera, a scheme we also follow.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14704366
Primary Topic
Crustacean biology and ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Portunoidea Rafinesque 1815

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Crustacean biology and ecology
article

Portunoidea Rafinesque 1815

article en

Abstract

Superfamily Portunoidea Rafinesque, 1815 Remarks: While the taxonomy of Portunoidea has previously been well studied, the phylogenetic relationships between the various groups now in the superfamily have been less settled with different systems being proposed (e.g., see like Schubart and Reuschel (2009) and Spiridonov et al. (2014). N. Evans (2018), based on morphological and molecular evidence, only recognized Geryonidae Colosi, 1924, Carcinidae MacLeay, 1838 and Portunidae Rafinesque, 1815 under the Portunoidea, leaving the status of one family, Brusiniidae Števčić, 1991 unresolved (but see Spiridonov 2020). We retain the Brusiniidae in the Portunoidea until more studies can be done. We follow Spiridonov et al. (2014) in recognizing the Podophthalminae Dana, 1851 and Lupocyclinae Alcock, 1899 as subfamilies under the Portunidae, and elevating Monomia Gistel, 1848 and Xiphonectes A. Milne-Edwards, 1873, to full genera; and N. Evans (2018) in recognizing Goniosupradens Davie & Ng, 2024 as full genus, and Thranita Evans, 2018 for members of the “ Thalamita prymna group”. In the Portuninae, the genera Portunus, Monomia and Xiphonectes had been shown to be composite (N. Evans 2018), many were resolved by Koch et al. (2022). For taxa treated herein, several species previously placed under Xiphonectes have recently been placed in new genera, a scheme we also follow.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
National Chung Hsing University (TW), National University of Singapore (SG), Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Crustacean biology and ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.