Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Framework for Improving the Decision-Making on the Quality Evaluation of English Classics Translation

English translations of literary classics are a subject of interest for many scholars and evaluators. However, the evaluation of the translations is a complex and multifaceted task, which necessitates a balance between linguistic accuracy, cultural fidelity, and readability. This makes traditional methods often fall short of catching the uncertainties, ambiguities, and subjective judgments. In an attempt to bridge these gaps between computational linguistics and translation studies, we introduce a mathematically grounded IVNS approach to evaluate the translation of English classics by flexible modeling of the ambiguities inherent in translation decisions. Then, we introduced an extended version of the MULTIMOORA method, called MULTIVNSMOORA, that can simultaneously account for multiple, often conflicting criteria to ensure well-adjusted decision-making about translation quality. Finally, we present a case study on Don Quixote to validate the practical applicability of the proposed IVNS approach, by which we offer a reproducible framework for assessing translations of other English literary works.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14826670
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Framework for Improving the Decision-Making on the Quality Evaluation of English Classics Translation

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Framework for Improving the Decision-Making on the Quality Evaluation of English Classics Translation

article en

Abstract

English translations of literary classics are a subject of interest for many scholars and evaluators. However, the evaluation of the translations is a complex and multifaceted task, which necessitates a balance between linguistic accuracy, cultural fidelity, and readability. This makes traditional methods often fall short of catching the uncertainties, ambiguities, and subjective judgments. In an attempt to bridge these gaps between computational linguistics and translation studies, we introduce a mathematically grounded IVNS approach to evaluate the translation of English classics by flexible modeling of the ambiguities inherent in translation decisions. Then, we introduced an extended version of the MULTIMOORA method, called MULTIVNSMOORA, that can simultaneously account for multiple, often conflicting criteria to ensure well-adjusted decision-making about translation quality. Finally, we present a case study on Don Quixote to validate the practical applicability of the proposed IVNS approach, by which we offer a reproducible framework for assessing translations of other English literary works.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Framework for Improving the Decision-Making on the Quality Evaluation of English Classics Translation · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS