Automated Ethical Requirements Classification in AI: The ERC4AI Tool

Context: The operationalization of AI ethical principles during the requirements engineering phase is paramount for creating ethically aligned AI systems. However, ethical requirements classification remains a significant challenge due to the abstract nature of ethical principles and the lack of practical tools to support developers. Objective: We introduce the EthicalRequirements4AI, a dataset comprising 1,093 annotated requirements, including ethical and non-ethical requirements. We also provide the Ethical Requirements Classification for AI (ERC4AI), a model for classifying requirements based on AI ethical principles. Method: Passenger Flow and PROMISE datasets were used to construct the EthicalRequirements4AI dataset, encompassing 156 requirements aligned with 11 AI ethical principles and 937 non-ethical requirements. Three language models – XLM-RoBERTa, BERT, and DistilBERT – were evaluated for binary and multi-label classification tasks. Results: BERT achieved the best performance, with a weighted average F1 score of 95\% in binary and 88\% in multi-label classification. The ERC4AI multi-label can classify requirements into Transparency (78\%), Responsibility (81\%), Trust (56\%), and Privacy (65\%), according to F1 score. Conclusions: ERC4AI offers a novel tool for researchers and developers to address ethical concerns early in AI development. The dataset and models are publicly available to foster further research and advancements in practical AI ethics.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14750447
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Ethical Requirements Classification in AI: The ERC4AI Tool

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Automated Ethical Requirements Classification in AI: The ERC4AI Tool

article en

Abstract

Context: The operationalization of AI ethical principles during the requirements engineering phase is paramount for creating ethically aligned AI systems. However, ethical requirements classification remains a significant challenge due to the abstract nature of ethical principles and the lack of practical tools to support developers. Objective: We introduce the EthicalRequirements4AI, a dataset comprising 1,093 annotated requirements, including ethical and non-ethical requirements. We also provide the Ethical Requirements Classification for AI (ERC4AI), a model for classifying requirements based on AI ethical principles. Method: Passenger Flow and PROMISE datasets were used to construct the EthicalRequirements4AI dataset, encompassing 156 requirements aligned with 11 AI ethical principles and 937 non-ethical requirements. Three language models – XLM-RoBERTa, BERT, and DistilBERT – were evaluated for binary and multi-label classification tasks. Results: BERT achieved the best performance, with a weighted average F1 score of 95\% in binary and 88\% in multi-label classification. The ERC4AI multi-label can classify requirements into Transparency (78\%), Responsibility (81\%), Trust (56\%), and Privacy (65\%), according to F1 score. Conclusions: ERC4AI offers a novel tool for researchers and developers to address ethical concerns early in AI development. The dataset and models are publicly available to foster further research and advancements in practical AI ethics.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidade de Brasília (BR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.