A review of the indirect expropriation standard in the pandemic and decarbonization Eras: Finding the balance

Contemporary global environmental threats and the COVID-19 pandemic underscore the necessity of international collaboration in protecting public health and the environment. As states transition to renewable energy solutions to address climate change, regulatory measures may impact foreign investments and property rights. This article examines the challenges and criteria in distinguishing between non-compensatory legitimate regulations and indirect expropriation in investment law, as well as the limitations on the expropriation standard in recent treaties, questioning the relevance of the expropriation standard in protecting investments in modern times. As global efforts to decarbonize energy industries intensify, I argue that states and investors may need to collaborate to effectively balance states’ right to regulate with investment protection. Indeed, balancing these competing rights starts at the treaty level, not at the arbitration stage, since an arbitral tribunal can only interpret the treaties before it.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15165785
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A review of the indirect expropriation standard in the pandemic and decarbonization Eras: Finding the balance

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

A review of the indirect expropriation standard in the pandemic and decarbonization Eras: Finding the balance

article en

Abstract

Contemporary global environmental threats and the COVID-19 pandemic underscore the necessity of international collaboration in protecting public health and the environment. As states transition to renewable energy solutions to address climate change, regulatory measures may impact foreign investments and property rights. This article examines the challenges and criteria in distinguishing between non-compensatory legitimate regulations and indirect expropriation in investment law, as well as the limitations on the expropriation standard in recent treaties, questioning the relevance of the expropriation standard in protecting investments in modern times. As global efforts to decarbonize energy industries intensify, I argue that states and investors may need to collaborate to effectively balance states’ right to regulate with investment protection. Indeed, balancing these competing rights starts at the treaty level, not at the arbitration stage, since an arbitral tribunal can only interpret the treaties before it.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Tulane University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.