Barred from the Ballot: Examining the Legal, Social, and Human Rights Implications of Prisoner

This socio-legal study offers a comprehensive analysis of the disenfranchisement of imprisoned persons in India, examining the legal, constitutional, and human rights dimensions of the issue. It focuses on Section 62(5) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which imposes a blanket ban on voting for all incarcerated individuals except those under preventive detention. The study explores the evolution of judicial interpretations, particularly the Supreme Court’s upholding of the ban, and highlights its disproportionate impact on marginalised communities who form the majority of the prison population. By comparing India’s exclusionary stance with more inclusive international practices, the article systematically discusses the philosophical, practical, and rehabilitative arguments for and against prisoner enfranchisement. It emphasises the broader consequences of disenfranchisement, including its effects on democratic legitimacy, social justice, and the rehabilitation of prisoners. The research ultimately advocates for nuanced legislative reforms and judicial re-examination of existing precedents, arguing that aligning India’s electoral laws with global human rights standards is crucial to uphold democratic inclusivity and foster the reintegration of incarcerated individuals into society.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15710901
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barred from the Ballot: Examining the Legal, Social, and Human Rights Implications of Prisoner

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Barred from the Ballot: Examining the Legal, Social, and Human Rights Implications of Prisoner

article en

Abstract

This socio-legal study offers a comprehensive analysis of the disenfranchisement of imprisoned persons in India, examining the legal, constitutional, and human rights dimensions of the issue. It focuses on Section 62(5) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which imposes a blanket ban on voting for all incarcerated individuals except those under preventive detention. The study explores the evolution of judicial interpretations, particularly the Supreme Court’s upholding of the ban, and highlights its disproportionate impact on marginalised communities who form the majority of the prison population. By comparing India’s exclusionary stance with more inclusive international practices, the article systematically discusses the philosophical, practical, and rehabilitative arguments for and against prisoner enfranchisement. It emphasises the broader consequences of disenfranchisement, including its effects on democratic legitimacy, social justice, and the rehabilitation of prisoners. The research ultimately advocates for nuanced legislative reforms and judicial re-examination of existing precedents, arguing that aligning India’s electoral laws with global human rights standards is crucial to uphold democratic inclusivity and foster the reintegration of incarcerated individuals into society.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Teerthanker Mahaveer University (IN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.