Palpostilpnus Aubert 1961

Key to the world species of Palpostilpnus, modified from Reshchikov et al. (2019) 1. Fore wing with infuscate transverse band.................................................................. 2 -. Fore wing lacking infuscate transverse band................................................................ 5 2. Fore wing with one infuscate transverse band; antenna without median white band; T2 with coarse punctures; propodeum sloping gradually..................................................................................... 3 -. Fore wing with two infuscate transverse bands; antenna with median white band; T2 with fine punctures; Propodeum sloping steeply.............................................................................................. 4 3. Mesosoma mostly reddish; infuscate transverse band of fore wing rather distal; hind tarsus brown, with white basitarsus; body shallowly and sparsely punctate; ovipositor as long as hind basitarsus; T1 about 3.0× as long as apical broad............................................................................................. P. rufinator (Aubert, 1961) -. Mesosoma black; infuscate transverse band of fore wing on distal 0.6; hind tarsus white; body coarsely and densely punctate; ovipositor 1.4× as long as hind basitarsus; T1 1.8× as long as apical broad................................................................................................. P. mangrovi Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 4. Frons, mesonotum and mesosternum transversally striated, shiny; ovipositor 1.5× as long as hind tarsus.................................................................................................. P. striator (Aubert, 1961) -. Frons, mesonotum and mesosternum finely punctate, entirely dull; ovipositor 2.1× as long as hind tarsus............................................................................................... P. papuator (Aubert, 1961) 5. Occipital carina broadly absent dorsally; T1 short and stout, 1.5× as long as apical width............................. 6 -. Occipital carina complete dorsally; T1 longer, at least 1.7× as long as apical width.................................. 9 6. Combined area of propodeum (area superomedia and area petiolaris) open anteriorly (Figs 11G, 14E).................. 7 -. Combined area of propodeum present (Figs 6G, 12G).........................................................8 7. Body black with reddish markings (Figs 2E, 11); basal half of scutellum with arched wrinkles (Fig. 11F)................................................................. P. ngoclinhensis Pham, Sheng, Park, Tran & Reshchikov, sp. nov -. Body reddish yellow with black markings (Figs 2G, 14); scutellum punctate, with setae (Fig. 14C)..................................................................... P. taynguyenensis Pham, Sheng, Park, Tran & Reshchikov, sp. nov 8. Body reddish with black markings (Fig. 3B); [mesosoma entirely reddish or with reddish marking basally on propodeum]; mesoscutum shorter than its maximum width (Fig. 12C)....... P. pterodactylus Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 -. Body ferruginous with black markings (Fig. 2D); mesoscutum as long as its maximum width (Fig. 6F)................................................................... P. incompletus Pham, Sheng, Park, Tran & Reshchikov, sp. nov 9. Combined area of propodeum absent or, if present anteriorly open.............................................. 10 -. Combined area of propodeum present and anteriorly closed................................................... 22 10. T2–T4 with a pair of small black sports laterally or T2 with a transverse black band and T3–T4 with a pair of small black sports or sometimes T2–T4 entirely reddish, without black markings................................................. 11 -. T2–T4 with a transverse black band or entirely black........................................................ 12 11. Mesosoma black with yellow marks (Figs 7C, 7F); mesoscutum with coarse granulose texture and distinct fine punctures............................................................................. P. maculatus Sheng & Sun, 2013 -. Mesosoma yellow, with lower part of mesopleuron and prescutellar groove black; mesoscutum with fine leathery texture and indistinct.............................................. P. hainanensis Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 12. Mesoscutum black, with or without yellow markings........................................................ 13 -. Mesoscutum mostly yellow or brown, with or without black markings........................................... 17 13. Mesoscutum entirely black (Fig. 5C); propodeum without any carinae (Fig. 5G).................................................................................. P. hoanglienensis Pham, Sheng, Park, Tran & Reshchikov, sp. nov. -. Mesoscutum with yellow markings; propodeum with posterior part of lateromedian longitudinal carina and lateral part of posterior transverse carina present....................................................................... 14 14. Mesoscutum with anterior 0.3 yellow (Fig. 4E); scutellum entirely yellow (Fig. 4E)................................................................................... P. cattienensis Pham, Sheng, Park, Tran & Reshchikov, sp. nov -. Mesoscutum with antero-laterally yellow (Fig. 8E); scutellum entirely black or with yellow marking.................. 15 15. Mesosoma largely black (Fig. 8D); postero-ocellar distance 3.2× ocular-ocellar distance (Fig. 8B)................................................................... P. melanothoracicus Pham, Sheng, Park, Tran & Reshchikov, sp. nov -. Mesosoma largely reddish; postero-ocellar distance 1.5–2.4× ocular-ocellar distance............................... 16 16. Propodeum with area postero-externa complete; scutellum entirely black; ovipositor 0.9× as long as hind basitarsus................................................................ P. trifolium Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 -. Propodeum with area postero-externa incomplete; scutellum laterally yellow; ovipositor 3.5× as long as hind basitarsus............................................................. P. tamasek Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 17. Epicnemial carina absent; hind tibia apically ferruginous.............. P. ranui Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 -. Epicnemial carina present; hind tibia apically black or entirely black........................................... 18 18. Area postero-externa open anteriorly; mesoscutum with black or brown markings................................. 19 -. Area postero-externa present; mesoscutum entirely yellowish, without black or brown markings...................... 21 19. Face wider, 1.7 times as wide as high; ovipositor sheath shorter than apical depth of metasoma...................................................................................... P. aki Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 -. Face narrower, 1.2× as wide as high (Figs 9A, 10A); ovipositor sheath distinct longer than apical depth of metasoma (Figs 9D, 10G).............................................................................................. 20 20. Postero-ocellar distance 1.7× as long as ocular-ocellar distance (Fig. 9B); superomedia and area petiolaris of propodeum open anteriorly (9G); fore wing vein 1cu-a postfurcal to M&RS; juxtacoxal carina complete................................................................................ P. melinhensis Pham, Sheng, Park, Tran & Reshchikov, sp. nov. -. Postero-ocellar distance 0.8× as long as ocular-ocellar distance (Fig. 10B); superomedia and area petiolaris of propodeum entirely absent (Fig. 10C); fore wing vein 1cu-a interstitial to M&RS; juxtacoxal carina absent......................................................................... P. meovacensis Pham, Sheng, Park, Tran & Reshchikov, sp. nov. 21. Postero-ocellar distance 2.0× as long as ocular-ocellar distance; mesosoma elongate, about 1.5×as long as high; hind part of T2 with black lens-shaped mark; T3 and T4 transversally black in the middle................................................................................................... P. angka Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 -. Postero-ocellar distance 3.6× as long as ocular-ocellar distance; mesosoma short, about 1.25× as long as high; hind part of T2–T4 with a black band................................ P. singaporensis Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 22. Mesosoma and metasoma entirely black.................................................................. 23 -. Mesosoma and metasoma black with yellow markings....................................................... 24 23. Antenna with 34 flagellomeres; lower side of hind femur without tubercles; ovipositor sheath shorter than apical depth of metasoma; antenna with middle flagellomeres white dorsally; hind tarsus testaceous......... P. brevis Sheng & Broad, 2011 -. Antenna with 22 flagellomeres; lower side of hind femur with tubercles; ovipositor sheath longer than apical depth of metasoma; antenna with middle flagellomeres entirely brownish; hind tarsus black...................... P. palpator (Aubert, 1961) 24. Mesoscutum with large, shallow punctures; postero-ocellar distance 3.4× as long as ocular-ocellar distance........................................................................ P. angkor Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 -. Mesoscutum densely reticulate-punctate; postero-ocellar distance 1.25× as long as ocular-ocellar distance.......................................................................................... P. rotundatus Sheng& Sun, 2013

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13921532
Primary Topic
Morphological variations and asymmetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Palpostilpnus Aubert 1961

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Morphological variations and asymmetry
article

Palpostilpnus Aubert 1961

article en

Abstract

Key to the world species of Palpostilpnus, modified from Reshchikov et al. (2019) 1. Fore wing with infuscate transverse band.................................................................. 2 -. Fore wing lacking infuscate transverse band................................................................ 5 2. Fore wing with one infuscate transverse band; antenna without median white band; T2 with coarse punctures; propodeum sloping gradually..................................................................................... 3 -. Fore wing with two infuscate transverse bands; antenna with median white band; T2 with fine punctures; Propodeum sloping steeply.............................................................................................. 4 3. Mesosoma mostly reddish; infuscate transverse band of fore wing rather distal; hind tarsus brown, with white basitarsus; body shallowly and sparsely punctate; ovipositor as long as hind basitarsus; T1 about 3.0× as long as apical broad............................................................................................. P. rufinator (Aubert, 1961) -. Mesosoma black; infuscate transverse band of fore wing on distal 0.6; hind tarsus white; body coarsely and densely punctate; ovipositor 1.4× as long as hind basitarsus; T1 1.8× as long as apical broad................................................................................................. P. mangrovi Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 4. Frons, mesonotum and mesosternum transversally striated, shiny; ovipositor 1.5× as long as hind tarsus.................................................................................................. P. striator (Aubert, 1961) -. Frons, mesonotum and mesosternum finely punctate, entirely dull; ovipositor 2.1× as long as hind tarsus............................................................................................... P. papuator (Aubert, 1961) 5. Occipital carina broadly absent dorsally; T1 short and stout, 1.5× as long as apical width............................. 6 -. Occipital carina complete dorsally; T1 longer, at least 1.7× as long as apical width.................................. 9 6. Combined area of propodeum (area superomedia and area petiolaris) open anteriorly (Figs 11G, 14E).................. 7 -. Combined area of propodeum present (Figs 6G, 12G).........................................................8 7. Body black with reddish markings (Figs 2E, 11); basal half of scutellum with arched wrinkles (Fig. 11F)................................................................. P. ngoclinhensis Pham, Sheng, Park, Tran & Reshchikov, sp. nov -. Body reddish yellow with black markings (Figs 2G, 14); scutellum punctate, with setae (Fig. 14C)..................................................................... P. taynguyenensis Pham, Sheng, Park, Tran & Reshchikov, sp. nov 8. Body reddish with black markings (Fig. 3B); [mesosoma entirely reddish or with reddish marking basally on propodeum]; mesoscutum shorter than its maximum width (Fig. 12C)....... P. pterodactylus Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 -. Body ferruginous with black markings (Fig. 2D); mesoscutum as long as its maximum width (Fig. 6F)................................................................... P. incompletus Pham, Sheng, Park, Tran & Reshchikov, sp. nov 9. Combined area of propodeum absent or, if present anteriorly open.............................................. 10 -. Combined area of propodeum present and anteriorly closed................................................... 22 10. T2–T4 with a pair of small black sports laterally or T2 with a transverse black band and T3–T4 with a pair of small black sports or sometimes T2–T4 entirely reddish, without black markings................................................. 11 -. T2–T4 with a transverse black band or entirely black........................................................ 12 11. Mesosoma black with yellow marks (Figs 7C, 7F); mesoscutum with coarse granulose texture and distinct fine punctures............................................................................. P. maculatus Sheng & Sun, 2013 -. Mesosoma yellow, with lower part of mesopleuron and prescutellar groove black; mesoscutum with fine leathery texture and indistinct.............................................. P. hainanensis Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 12. Mesoscutum black, with or without yellow markings........................................................ 13 -. Mesoscutum mostly yellow or brown, with or without black markings........................................... 17 13. Mesoscutum entirely black (Fig. 5C); propodeum without any carinae (Fig. 5G).................................................................................. P. hoanglienensis Pham, Sheng, Park, Tran & Reshchikov, sp. nov. -. Mesoscutum with yellow markings; propodeum with posterior part of lateromedian longitudinal carina and lateral part of posterior transverse carina present....................................................................... 14 14. Mesoscutum with anterior 0.3 yellow (Fig. 4E); scutellum entirely yellow (Fig. 4E)................................................................................... P. cattienensis Pham, Sheng, Park, Tran & Reshchikov, sp. nov -. Mesoscutum with antero-laterally yellow (Fig. 8E); scutellum entirely black or with yellow marking.................. 15 15. Mesosoma largely black (Fig. 8D); postero-ocellar distance 3.2× ocular-ocellar distance (Fig. 8B)................................................................... P. melanothoracicus Pham, Sheng, Park, Tran & Reshchikov, sp. nov -. Mesosoma largely reddish; postero-ocellar distance 1.5–2.4× ocular-ocellar distance............................... 16 16. Propodeum with area postero-externa complete; scutellum entirely black; ovipositor 0.9× as long as hind basitarsus................................................................ P. trifolium Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 -. Propodeum with area postero-externa incomplete; scutellum laterally yellow; ovipositor 3.5× as long as hind basitarsus............................................................. P. tamasek Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 17. Epicnemial carina absent; hind tibia apically ferruginous.............. P. ranui Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 -. Epicnemial carina present; hind tibia apically black or entirely black........................................... 18 18. Area postero-externa open anteriorly; mesoscutum with black or brown markings................................. 19 -. Area postero-externa present; mesoscutum entirely yellowish, without black or brown markings...................... 21 19. Face wider, 1.7 times as wide as high; ovipositor sheath shorter than apical depth of metasoma...................................................................................... P. aki Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 -. Face narrower, 1.2× as wide as high (Figs 9A, 10A); ovipositor sheath distinct longer than apical depth of metasoma (Figs 9D, 10G).............................................................................................. 20 20. Postero-ocellar distance 1.7× as long as ocular-ocellar distance (Fig. 9B); superomedia and area petiolaris of propodeum open anteriorly (9G); fore wing vein 1cu-a postfurcal to M&RS; juxtacoxal carina complete................................................................................ P. melinhensis Pham, Sheng, Park, Tran & Reshchikov, sp. nov. -. Postero-ocellar distance 0.8× as long as ocular-ocellar distance (Fig. 10B); superomedia and area petiolaris of propodeum entirely absent (Fig. 10C); fore wing vein 1cu-a interstitial to M&RS; juxtacoxal carina absent......................................................................... P. meovacensis Pham, Sheng, Park, Tran & Reshchikov, sp. nov. 21. Postero-ocellar distance 2.0× as long as ocular-ocellar distance; mesosoma elongate, about 1.5×as long as high; hind part of T2 with black lens-shaped mark; T3 and T4 transversally black in the middle................................................................................................... P. angka Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 -. Postero-ocellar distance 3.6× as long as ocular-ocellar distance; mesosoma short, about 1.25× as long as high; hind part of T2–T4 with a black band................................ P. singaporensis Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 22. Mesosoma and metasoma entirely black.................................................................. 23 -. Mesosoma and metasoma black with yellow markings....................................................... 24 23. Antenna with 34 flagellomeres; lower side of hind femur without tubercles; ovipositor sheath shorter than apical depth of metasoma; antenna with middle flagellomeres white dorsally; hind tarsus testaceous......... P. brevis Sheng & Broad, 2011 -. Antenna with 22 flagellomeres; lower side of hind femur with tubercles; ovipositor sheath longer than apical depth of metasoma; antenna with middle flagellomeres entirely brownish; hind tarsus black...................... P. palpator (Aubert, 1961) 24. Mesoscutum with large, shallow punctures; postero-ocellar distance 3.4× as long as ocular-ocellar distance........................................................................ P. angkor Reshchikov, Santos, Liu, Barthélémy, 2019 -. Mesoscutum densely reticulate-punctate; postero-ocellar distance 1.25× as long as ocular-ocellar distance.......................................................................................... P. rotundatus Sheng& Sun, 2013

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
State Forestry and Grassland Administration (CN), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Morphological variations and asymmetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.