The Role of Extreme Rhetoric in World War II: A Historical Analysis of Persuasion and Its Modern Parallels

This paper explores the role of extreme rhetoric during World War II, analyzing how persuasive language shaped public opinion, incited nationalist sentiments, and justified violent ideologies. By examining the rhetorical strategies employed by figures such as Adolf Hitler, the paper highlights how ethos, pathos, and logos were manipulated to foster division, vilify marginalized groups, and mobilize mass support for aggressive policies. Additionally, the paper draws contemporary parallels to corporate environments, exploring how extreme rhetoric in modern settings can similarly manipulate emotions, sow division, and erode trust. This study argues for the need to promote balanced discourse in both historical and modern contexts to mitigate the harmful impacts of extreme rhetoric.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14289581
Primary Topic
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Extreme Rhetoric in World War II: A Historical Analysis of Persuasion and Its Modern Parallels

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
article

The Role of Extreme Rhetoric in World War II: A Historical Analysis of Persuasion and Its Modern Parallels

article en

Abstract

This paper explores the role of extreme rhetoric during World War II, analyzing how persuasive language shaped public opinion, incited nationalist sentiments, and justified violent ideologies. By examining the rhetorical strategies employed by figures such as Adolf Hitler, the paper highlights how ethos, pathos, and logos were manipulated to foster division, vilify marginalized groups, and mobilize mass support for aggressive policies. Additionally, the paper draws contemporary parallels to corporate environments, exploring how extreme rhetoric in modern settings can similarly manipulate emotions, sow division, and erode trust. This study argues for the need to promote balanced discourse in both historical and modern contexts to mitigate the harmful impacts of extreme rhetoric.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Rhetoric and Communication Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Role of Extreme Rhetoric in World War II: A Historical Analysis of Persuasion and Its Modern Parallels · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS