Corrective Feedback of Teacher and Student Engagement: A Mixed Method

The study aimed to describe the lived experiences of Filipino major students in a local college on the between corrective feedback and student engagement and their learning. This study engaged a mixed-methods design, utilizing a parallel convergent approach. The participants of the study were Filipino major students from all grade levels. One hundred ninety students were randomly selected for the quantitative and 10 for the qualitative: five (5) in-depth interviews and five (5) focus group discussions, which were purposefully selected. In the quantitative phase, the results revealed a specific correlation analysis between perceived corrective feedback and student engagement among Filipino majors is high. Additionally, the students’ insights shared fostered a helpful environment for student engagement, and teaching-learning strategies. Moreover,the result of qualitative phase from different participants have diverse perspective especially on their insights and experiences. Lastly, the qualitative data mostly corroborated the qualitative data.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14616603
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corrective Feedback of Teacher and Student Engagement: A Mixed Method

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Corrective Feedback of Teacher and Student Engagement: A Mixed Method

article en

Abstract

The study aimed to describe the lived experiences of Filipino major students in a local college on the between corrective feedback and student engagement and their learning. This study engaged a mixed-methods design, utilizing a parallel convergent approach. The participants of the study were Filipino major students from all grade levels. One hundred ninety students were randomly selected for the quantitative and 10 for the qualitative: five (5) in-depth interviews and five (5) focus group discussions, which were purposefully selected. In the quantitative phase, the results revealed a specific correlation analysis between perceived corrective feedback and student engagement among Filipino majors is high. Additionally, the students’ insights shared fostered a helpful environment for student engagement, and teaching-learning strategies. Moreover,the result of qualitative phase from different participants have diverse perspective especially on their insights and experiences. Lastly, the qualitative data mostly corroborated the qualitative data.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.