Automated Penetration Testing

Automated penetration testing has emerged as a critical tool in the cyber security landscape, offering the ability to rapidly identify and address vulnerabilities within increasingly complex network infrastructures. This seminar report explores the development and application of automated penetration testing tools, which streamline traditional, labor-intensive processes by leveraging automation to conduct thorough security assessments. The report delves into various automated tools and frameworks, such as Metasploit, Burp Suite, and OpenVAS, and examines their methodologies, capabilities, and limitations. By analyzing both the advantages and disadvantages of automation in penetration testing, this report highlights the efficiency gains in vulnerability detection and the potential pitfalls, such as false positives and the limited scope of predefined attack scenarios. The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning into automated testing is also discussed, emphasizing its role in enhancing the adaptability and accuracy of these tools. While automation significantly improves the speed and scalability of penetration testing, it is not a replacement for human expertise. The conclusion underscores the importance of combining automated tools with manual testing to ensure comprehensive security coverage, especially as cyber threats continue to evolve.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13988309
Primary Topic
Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Penetration Testing

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
article

Automated Penetration Testing

article en

Abstract

Automated penetration testing has emerged as a critical tool in the cyber security landscape, offering the ability to rapidly identify and address vulnerabilities within increasingly complex network infrastructures. This seminar report explores the development and application of automated penetration testing tools, which streamline traditional, labor-intensive processes by leveraging automation to conduct thorough security assessments. The report delves into various automated tools and frameworks, such as Metasploit, Burp Suite, and OpenVAS, and examines their methodologies, capabilities, and limitations. By analyzing both the advantages and disadvantages of automation in penetration testing, this report highlights the efficiency gains in vulnerability detection and the potential pitfalls, such as false positives and the limited scope of predefined attack scenarios. The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning into automated testing is also discussed, emphasizing its role in enhancing the adaptability and accuracy of these tools. While automation significantly improves the speed and scalability of penetration testing, it is not a replacement for human expertise. The conclusion underscores the importance of combining automated tools with manual testing to ensure comprehensive security coverage, especially as cyber threats continue to evolve.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Automated Penetration Testing · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS