The Woman Researcher's Tale: A Review of Bibliometric Methods and Results for Studying Gender in Science

There has been a notable increase of bibliometric research studying gender in academia. This narrative review aims to organize and synthesize this extensive body of work to uncover new insights into gender disparities in science. We begin by analyzing key methodological elements, including gender assignment techniques, units of analysis, and causality issues. Next, we identify and categorize the main findings of the literature into three groups: differences in academia, causes behind these differences, and their primary consequences. Finally, we point at gaps in the literature and propose new lines of inquiry to address these gaps. These proposals include more rigorous gender assignment algorithms, fostering comparability of studies, exploring a broader range of topics, and improve the interpretability and context of results when studying gender.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10590299
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Woman Researcher's Tale: A Review of Bibliometric Methods and Results for Studying Gender in Science

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

The Woman Researcher's Tale: A Review of Bibliometric Methods and Results for Studying Gender in Science

article en

Abstract

There has been a notable increase of bibliometric research studying gender in academia. This narrative review aims to organize and synthesize this extensive body of work to uncover new insights into gender disparities in science. We begin by analyzing key methodological elements, including gender assignment techniques, units of analysis, and causality issues. Next, we identify and categorize the main findings of the literature into three groups: differences in academia, causes behind these differences, and their primary consequences. Finally, we point at gaps in the literature and propose new lines of inquiry to address these gaps. These proposals include more rigorous gender assignment algorithms, fostering comparability of studies, exploring a broader range of topics, and improve the interpretability and context of results when studying gender.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Universidad de Granada (ES), Unidades Centrales Científico-Técnicas (ES), Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.