Visualization and Automation in Data Science: Exploring the Paradox of Humans-in-the-Loop

This position paper explores the interplay between automation and human involvement in data science. It synthesizes perspectives from Automated Data Science (AutoDS) and Interactive Data Visualization (VIS), which traditionally represent opposing ends of the human-machine spectrum. While AutoDS aims to enhance efficiency by reducing human tasks, VIS emphasizes the importance of nuanced understanding, innovation, and context provided by human involvement. This paper examines these dichotomies through an online survey and advocates for a balanced approach that harmonizes the efficiency of automation with the irreplaceable insights of human expertise. Ultimately, we address the essential question of not just what we can automate, but what we should automate, seeking strategies that prioritize technological advancement alongside the fundamental need for human oversight.

Publication Details

Journal
Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-265721
Primary Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visualization and Automation in Data Science: Exploring the Paradox of Humans-in-the-Loop

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Data Visualization and Analytics
article

Visualization and Automation in Data Science: Exploring the Paradox of Humans-in-the-Loop

article en

Abstract

This position paper explores the interplay between automation and human involvement in data science. It synthesizes perspectives from Automated Data Science (AutoDS) and Interactive Data Visualization (VIS), which traditionally represent opposing ends of the human-machine spectrum. While AutoDS aims to enhance efficiency by reducing human tasks, VIS emphasizes the importance of nuanced understanding, innovation, and context provided by human involvement. This paper examines these dichotomies through an online survey and advocates for a balanced approach that harmonizes the efficiency of automation with the irreplaceable insights of human expertise. Ultimately, we address the essential question of not just what we can automate, but what we should automate, seeking strategies that prioritize technological advancement alongside the fundamental need for human oversight.

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Data Visualization and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.