Unfit for consumption: microbiological risks of natural water sources in rural areas

Background: Access to clean and safe water is vital for public health [1], especially in rural areas, where many households depend on untreated natural water sources [2]. Objective: This cross-sectional study combines an epidemiological survey with microbiological analysis to assess the risks of untreated water consumption and identify populations vulnerable to waterborne diseases. Methods: Drinking water samples were collected from 31 wells (on private properties) and 9 natural streams (fountains) across two parishes (Chaves municipality). Samples were analyzed according to Decreto-Lei 69/2023, following ISO standards for total heterotrophic microorganisms, total coliforms, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus spp., and Clostridium perfringens. A survey was conducted to understand water usage patterns and identify at-risk populations. Epidemiological data on age, water usage, preferences, and contamination sources were collected from 28 households (58 individuals). Results: Microbiological analysis showed that 93% (37 out of 40) of samples were unsafe for consumption. Well water was heavily contaminated, with coliform bacteria (90%), Escherichia coli (55%), Enterococcus spp. (55%), and Clostridium perfringens (52%). Only two well water samples and one natural stream sample were in conformity with the legislation. The majority of individuals involved in the study (61%) belonged to age groups at higher risk (<15 years – 2% and >65 years – 59%), therefore more susceptible to waterborne diseases. Among households, 93% used well water, primarily for irrigation (48%), hygiene (17%), cooking and laundry (15% each), and drinking (5%). Twenty-nine percent drank water from natural streams. When asked about drinking preferences, 32% favored bottled water, 22% chose mains water, 18% preferred stream water, and 7% well water. Regarding contamination sources, 86% of households had small horticultural operations, 64% kept farm animals, and although most households (89%) had public sanitation, 11% still relied on septic tanks. Conclusions: This study suggests that untreated water sources, such as wells and natural streams, may pose health risks in rural areas. Many households rely on these sources without full awareness of contamination risks, increasing their vulnerability to waterborne diseases. The study also has a citizen science component, as results will be shared with the local population to raise awareness and promote safe water usage practices.

Publication Details

Journal
Science Letters
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2025.383
Primary Topic
Fecal contamination and water quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unfit for consumption: microbiological risks of natural water sources in rural areas

Science Letters
Fecal contamination and water quality
article

Unfit for consumption: microbiological risks of natural water sources in rural areas

article en

Abstract

Background: Access to clean and safe water is vital for public health [1], especially in rural areas, where many households depend on untreated natural water sources [2]. Objective: This cross-sectional study combines an epidemiological survey with microbiological analysis to assess the risks of untreated water consumption and identify populations vulnerable to waterborne diseases. Methods: Drinking water samples were collected from 31 wells (on private properties) and 9 natural streams (fountains) across two parishes (Chaves municipality). Samples were analyzed according to Decreto-Lei 69/2023, following ISO standards for total heterotrophic microorganisms, total coliforms, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus spp., and Clostridium perfringens. A survey was conducted to understand water usage patterns and identify at-risk populations. Epidemiological data on age, water usage, preferences, and contamination sources were collected from 28 households (58 individuals). Results: Microbiological analysis showed that 93% (37 out of 40) of samples were unsafe for consumption. Well water was heavily contaminated, with coliform bacteria (90%), Escherichia coli (55%), Enterococcus spp. (55%), and Clostridium perfringens (52%). Only two well water samples and one natural stream sample were in conformity with the legislation. The majority of individuals involved in the study (61%) belonged to age groups at higher risk (<15 years – 2% and >65 years – 59%), therefore more susceptible to waterborne diseases. Among households, 93% used well water, primarily for irrigation (48%), hygiene (17%), cooking and laundry (15% each), and drinking (5%). Twenty-nine percent drank water from natural streams. When asked about drinking preferences, 32% favored bottled water, 22% chose mains water, 18% preferred stream water, and 7% well water. Regarding contamination sources, 86% of households had small horticultural operations, 64% kept farm animals, and although most households (89%) had public sanitation, 11% still relied on septic tanks. Conclusions: This study suggests that untreated water sources, such as wells and natural streams, may pose health risks in rural areas. Many households rely on these sources without full awareness of contamination risks, increasing their vulnerability to waterborne diseases. The study also has a citizen science component, as results will be shared with the local population to raise awareness and promote safe water usage practices.

Science Letters
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Fecal contamination and water quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.