A comparative assessment of stability and satisfaction between two mandibular lingual retainers in orthodontic patients. A 2-year follow-up, single practice-based randomized trial.

Objective This study aimed to evaluate and compare the stability of mandibular dental arch dimensions and patient satisfaction between two types of fixed retainers-3-strand round twisted (RT) and 8-strand rectangular braided (RB)-both of which are bonded to all six anterior mandibular teeth.Trial Design 2-arm parallel, two-center prospective randomized controlled trial.Methods: Participants 133 orthodontic patients (median age 24.6 years, 25th percentile = 17.2 years, 75th percentile = 32.4 years) were recruited.Interventions These patients were randomly assigned to receive either an RT or RB wire retainer at a 1:1 ratio.Randomization It was achieved using random permuted blocks of sizes 4, 6, or 8, which were concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.Outcomes The primary outcome was the change in the irregularity index, with secondary outcomes including arch length; intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths; and patient satisfaction. Evaluations were performed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after retainer placement. Dental cast measurements were analyzed using random effects linear regression, and satisfaction was assessed at each time point.Blinding Blinding of patients was not feasible. Only blinding the assessor for patient satisfaction was achieved.Results Cast measurements remained relatively stable from T1 to T6, with no significant difference attributed to the retainer type (RT or RB). Time significantly affected all cast measurements except for the irregularity index. There was no significant correlation between retainer type or time and satisfaction questionnaire responses, although the responses varied by question. No harms were observed.Conclusions Both RT and RB wire retainers effectively maintain mandibular arch alignment and are equally well tolerated by patients in the medium term.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/86961
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative assessment of stability and satisfaction between two mandibular lingual retainers in orthodontic patients. A 2-year follow-up, single practice-based randomized trial.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

A comparative assessment of stability and satisfaction between two mandibular lingual retainers in orthodontic patients. A 2-year follow-up, single practice-based randomized trial.

article en

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to evaluate and compare the stability of mandibular dental arch dimensions and patient satisfaction between two types of fixed retainers-3-strand round twisted (RT) and 8-strand rectangular braided (RB)-both of which are bonded to all six anterior mandibular teeth.Trial Design 2-arm parallel, two-center prospective randomized controlled trial.Methods: Participants 133 orthodontic patients (median age 24.6 years, 25th percentile = 17.2 years, 75th percentile = 32.4 years) were recruited.Interventions These patients were randomly assigned to receive either an RT or RB wire retainer at a 1:1 ratio.Randomization It was achieved using random permuted blocks of sizes 4, 6, or 8, which were concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.Outcomes The primary outcome was the change in the irregularity index, with secondary outcomes including arch length; intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths; and patient satisfaction. Evaluations were performed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after retainer placement. Dental cast measurements were analyzed using random effects linear regression, and satisfaction was assessed at each time point.Blinding Blinding of patients was not feasible. Only blinding the assessor for patient satisfaction was achieved.Results Cast measurements remained relatively stable from T1 to T6, with no significant difference attributed to the retainer type (RT or RB). Time significantly affected all cast measurements except for the irregularity index. There was no significant correlation between retainer type or time and satisfaction questionnaire responses, although the responses varied by question. No harms were observed.Conclusions Both RT and RB wire retainers effectively maintain mandibular arch alignment and are equally well tolerated by patients in the medium term.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Govt. Dental College & Hospital (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.