Clinical and paraclinical features distinguish fatigue from depression-predominant phenotypes in multiple sclerosis.

In clinical routine, it might be difficult to distinguish between fatigue and depression in Multiple sclerosis (MS). We investigated in two independent observational cohort studies which clinical and paraclinical features distinguish patients reporting fatigue but no depressive symptoms from those suffering from depressive symptoms but having no relevant fatigue. In Study 1, n = 156 MS patients underwent fatigue, depression, cognitive screening and flow cytometry measurements. In Study 2, n = 54 MS patients performed a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation. Patients reporting predominantly fatigue symptoms were older, had a lower information processing speed and higher EDSS compared to those scoring high on depression. CD3 + CD4 + T-helper cells count distinguished patients with depressive symptoms from those with neither depression nor fatigue. Study 2 demonstrated similar results. Additionally, progressive MS was associated with fatigue. From the whole neuropsychological test battery only SDMT distinguished fatigue from depressive phenotypes with the latter performing better. In both studies the groups did not differ regarding any other baseline variable including disease activity. Older age, slow information processing, worse physical disability and progressive disease course are distinguishing features of patients reporting more fatigue than depressive symptoms. Higher peripheral inflammatory cell counts seem to characterize depression.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/89430
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and paraclinical features distinguish fatigue from depression-predominant phenotypes in multiple sclerosis.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Clinical and paraclinical features distinguish fatigue from depression-predominant phenotypes in multiple sclerosis.

article en

Abstract

In clinical routine, it might be difficult to distinguish between fatigue and depression in Multiple sclerosis (MS). We investigated in two independent observational cohort studies which clinical and paraclinical features distinguish patients reporting fatigue but no depressive symptoms from those suffering from depressive symptoms but having no relevant fatigue. In Study 1, n = 156 MS patients underwent fatigue, depression, cognitive screening and flow cytometry measurements. In Study 2, n = 54 MS patients performed a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation. Patients reporting predominantly fatigue symptoms were older, had a lower information processing speed and higher EDSS compared to those scoring high on depression. CD3 + CD4 + T-helper cells count distinguished patients with depressive symptoms from those with neither depression nor fatigue. Study 2 demonstrated similar results. Additionally, progressive MS was associated with fatigue. From the whole neuropsychological test battery only SDMT distinguished fatigue from depressive phenotypes with the latter performing better. In both studies the groups did not differ regarding any other baseline variable including disease activity. Older age, slow information processing, worse physical disability and progressive disease course are distinguishing features of patients reporting more fatigue than depressive symptoms. Higher peripheral inflammatory cell counts seem to characterize depression.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.