Knowledge Graph embedding based missing metadata prediction

The increasing volume and complexity of data collected in experimental settings necessitate rigorous methodologies to ensure that such metadata remains Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR). The RDF graph, as a representation of knowledge graph, can support these FAIR principles. However, metadata records accompanying legacy data may be incomplete for various reasons, such as adherence to outdated standards, omission of essential parameters and errors. To improve the quality of metadata, we employ knowledge graph embedding techniques to predict missing metadata stored in RDF graph. Subsequently, using a classifier to verify the accuracy of the predicted metadata. The best results show that our methods can correctly recover 89.5% of the metadata, with a precision of 93% after classification.

Publication Details

Journal
PUBLISSO (German National Library of Medicine)
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4126/frl01-006488505
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge Graph embedding based missing metadata prediction

PUBLISSO (German National Library of Medicine)
Research Data Management Practices
article

Knowledge Graph embedding based missing metadata prediction

article en

Abstract

The increasing volume and complexity of data collected in experimental settings necessitate rigorous methodologies to ensure that such metadata remains Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR). The RDF graph, as a representation of knowledge graph, can support these FAIR principles. However, metadata records accompanying legacy data may be incomplete for various reasons, such as adherence to outdated standards, omission of essential parameters and errors. To improve the quality of metadata, we employ knowledge graph embedding techniques to predict missing metadata stored in RDF graph. Subsequently, using a classifier to verify the accuracy of the predicted metadata. The best results show that our methods can correctly recover 89.5% of the metadata, with a precision of 93% after classification.

PUBLISSO (German National Library of Medicine)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.