The State of Material Circularity for Critical Metals

The demand for critical materials continues to increase as technology continues to develop. However, these material reserves and resources are limited. This poses a risk of future material scarcity. This thesis analysed the current state and the future potential of 11 critical materials, including Beryllium, Borates, Fluorine, Gold, Magnesium, Niobium, Phosphorous, Rhenium, Tantalum, Tin and Tungsten. The methodology used in this thesis follows the research conducted by Lundaev et al. (2023), utilizing the growth S-curve and logistic-bell curve models with historical production, reserves and resources data to project future production trends, estimate the peak production and the depletion of material reserves or resources. The results indicated that some materials are approaching their peak production within a few years and most of them in a few decades. After reaching the peak, material production will decline until its reserves or resources depleted near in the future. To reduce or delay the risk of material depletion, circularity strategies are necessary, including increasing material recycling and substituting with alternatives that are less critical.

Publication Details

Journal
h_docs
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48444/h_docs-pub-558
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The State of Material Circularity for Critical Metals

h_docs
Extraction and Separation Processes
article

The State of Material Circularity for Critical Metals

article en

Abstract

The demand for critical materials continues to increase as technology continues to develop. However, these material reserves and resources are limited. This poses a risk of future material scarcity. This thesis analysed the current state and the future potential of 11 critical materials, including Beryllium, Borates, Fluorine, Gold, Magnesium, Niobium, Phosphorous, Rhenium, Tantalum, Tin and Tungsten. The methodology used in this thesis follows the research conducted by Lundaev et al. (2023), utilizing the growth S-curve and logistic-bell curve models with historical production, reserves and resources data to project future production trends, estimate the peak production and the depletion of material reserves or resources. The results indicated that some materials are approaching their peak production within a few years and most of them in a few decades. After reaching the peak, material production will decline until its reserves or resources depleted near in the future. To reduce or delay the risk of material depletion, circularity strategies are necessary, including increasing material recycling and substituting with alternatives that are less critical.

h_docs
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Extraction and Separation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The State of Material Circularity for Critical Metals · h_docs (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS