Demitizzare la scienza? Un bilancio attuale del confronto tra Castelli e Bultmann sulla demitizzazione

The essay poses the question of the demythization of science starting from the confrontation between Castelli and Bultmann in the early 1960s at the start of the Roman Colloquia on Demythization. Bultmann argues that modern science has demythologized the facts narrated in the Bible and imposes a new interpretation of the meaning of the kerygma. Castelli opposes the idea of the connection between kerygma and historicity of the facts narrated and interprets demythization as a conditioning by science on the rhythms of life. It is on this latter aspect that future demythization must be realized. In the second part of the essay, the question of the demythization of science is posed from the phenomenon of science denialism: the existential dimension as an identity factor that conditions the acceptance of scientific truths, conspiracy as a surrogate for lost narrative identities, and the recovery of trust as an antidote to denialism repropose elements of that confrontation.

Publication Details

Journal
IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4454/1fjbkq41
Primary Topic
Italian Literature and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Demitizzare la scienza? Un bilancio attuale del confronto tra Castelli e Bultmann sulla demitizzazione

IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)
Italian Literature and Culture
article

Demitizzare la scienza? Un bilancio attuale del confronto tra Castelli e Bultmann sulla demitizzazione

article en

Abstract

The essay poses the question of the demythization of science starting from the confrontation between Castelli and Bultmann in the early 1960s at the start of the Roman Colloquia on Demythization. Bultmann argues that modern science has demythologized the facts narrated in the Bible and imposes a new interpretation of the meaning of the kerygma. Castelli opposes the idea of the connection between kerygma and historicity of the facts narrated and interprets demythization as a conditioning by science on the rhythms of life. It is on this latter aspect that future demythization must be realized. In the second part of the essay, the question of the demythization of science is posed from the phenomenon of science denialism: the existential dimension as an identity factor that conditions the acceptance of scientific truths, conspiracy as a surrogate for lost narrative identities, and the recovery of trust as an antidote to denialism repropose elements of that confrontation.

IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Italian Literature and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.