Transport planning and the policy cycle:analysing deployed instruments and their interactions

Transport planners and policymakers rely on a mix of policy instruments to deal with transport problems. The fit, or lack thereof, between instruments can make a difference in policy outcomes. Recently, more attention has been paid to how various policy instruments interact and complement each other to support effective problem-solving. Using examples from Dutch transport planning, we explore the interaction between instruments both within and across the various stages of the policy cycle. We find that instrument complementarity is not a given. Since transport instrument mixes evolve incrementally over time, they include instrumental legacies of various past planning and policy logics. The findings illustrate and help understand how and why transport planning instruments that were employed under different logics can work against each other. This result raises questions about how and where transport policymakers should redesign existing policy instruments when introducing new ones to address transportation problems.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Published
2025-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800888784.00022
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transport planning and the policy cycle:analysing deployed instruments and their interactions

University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Transport planning and the policy cycle:analysing deployed instruments and their interactions

article en

Abstract

Transport planners and policymakers rely on a mix of policy instruments to deal with transport problems. The fit, or lack thereof, between instruments can make a difference in policy outcomes. Recently, more attention has been paid to how various policy instruments interact and complement each other to support effective problem-solving. Using examples from Dutch transport planning, we explore the interaction between instruments both within and across the various stages of the policy cycle. We find that instrument complementarity is not a given. Since transport instrument mixes evolve incrementally over time, they include instrumental legacies of various past planning and policy logics. The findings illustrate and help understand how and why transport planning instruments that were employed under different logics can work against each other. This result raises questions about how and where transport policymakers should redesign existing policy instruments when introducing new ones to address transportation problems.

University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
Institute for Urban and Regional Research (AT)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.