The subsidy-mosaic for agricultural weather insurance in Germany

The subsidisation of agricultural weather insurance is gaining momentum in European agriculture, with the aim of increasing farmers' self-responsibility and eliminating the need for ad hoc disaster payments. The implementation and design of agricultural weather insurance subsidies vary considerably from country to country. We show here that in Germany there are even fundamental differences within the country due to the different weather insurance subsidy schemes of the federal states. For example, some federal states do not subsidise weather insurance, and other federal states that do subsidise weather insurance, differ in which crops or perils are supported. This insurance subsidy mosaic increases inequality across farms and is likely to increase the cost of insurance. In addition, small federal-state-specific insurance markets are less attractive to insurance companies, which has a negative impact on competition among insurance companies and innovation in insurance products. We conclude that harmonised approaches to insurance support that incentivise on-farm risk management and adaptation to climate change are needed.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000724730
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The subsidy-mosaic for agricultural weather insurance in Germany

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

The subsidy-mosaic for agricultural weather insurance in Germany

article en

Abstract

The subsidisation of agricultural weather insurance is gaining momentum in European agriculture, with the aim of increasing farmers' self-responsibility and eliminating the need for ad hoc disaster payments. The implementation and design of agricultural weather insurance subsidies vary considerably from country to country. We show here that in Germany there are even fundamental differences within the country due to the different weather insurance subsidy schemes of the federal states. For example, some federal states do not subsidise weather insurance, and other federal states that do subsidise weather insurance, differ in which crops or perils are supported. This insurance subsidy mosaic increases inequality across farms and is likely to increase the cost of insurance. In addition, small federal-state-specific insurance markets are less attractive to insurance companies, which has a negative impact on competition among insurance companies and innovation in insurance products. We conclude that harmonised approaches to insurance support that incentivise on-farm risk management and adaptation to climate change are needed.

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.