Is face stability a problem in mechanised tunnelling through squeezing ground?

In the literature, a view can be found that the potential hazard of face instability is rather subordinate in mechanised tunnelling through squeezing ground; according to other works, unstable face conditions must be expected even in the case of minor squeezing. This paper contributes to a clarification of this question, by reviewing the expressed opinions; making a clear distinction between questions of stability and questions of deformation; explaining that a generally valid statement cannot be made; and showing that under certain conditions, the manifestations of face instability and squeezing may be similar in terms of excavation volume and cutterhead torque, although the underlying mechanisms are different from a mechanics viewpoint.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000705960
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is face stability a problem in mechanised tunnelling through squeezing ground?

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
article

Is face stability a problem in mechanised tunnelling through squeezing ground?

article en

Abstract

In the literature, a view can be found that the potential hazard of face instability is rather subordinate in mechanised tunnelling through squeezing ground; according to other works, unstable face conditions must be expected even in the case of minor squeezing. This paper contributes to a clarification of this question, by reviewing the expressed opinions; making a clear distinction between questions of stability and questions of deformation; explaining that a generally valid statement cannot be made; and showing that under certain conditions, the manifestations of face instability and squeezing may be similar in terms of excavation volume and cutterhead torque, although the underlying mechanisms are different from a mechanics viewpoint.

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.