Do attitudes toward thinking influence the benefit of memory strategies? Exploring the relationships between Need for Cognition, the drawing effect, the generation effect, and the production effect in free recall

Three experiments explored whether Need for Cognition (NFC) affects the memory benefits associated with drawing, generating, and producing while studying. In three experiments, undergraduate students studied a list of words while implementing a designated encoding strategy, followed by a free recall test. Experiment 1 had participants study half of the words by drawing and the other half by writing. In Experiment 2, participants generated half of the words from a definition and typed the other half. Finally, in Experiment 3, participants read half of the words aloud while studying, and read the remaining words silently. The three experiments replicated the memory benefits associated with the drawing effect, generation effect, and production effect (i.e., better recall from the more elaborative strategy), but NFC did not significantly predict the magnitude of these memory benefits or overall recall performance. These findings suggest that these encoding strategies may aid memory regardless of NFC level.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48336/zk6f-jc49
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do attitudes toward thinking influence the benefit of memory strategies? Exploring the relationships between Need for Cognition, the drawing effect, the generation effect, and the production effect in free recall

Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)
Memory Processes and Influences
article

Do attitudes toward thinking influence the benefit of memory strategies? Exploring the relationships between Need for Cognition, the drawing effect, the generation effect, and the production effect in free recall

article en

Abstract

Three experiments explored whether Need for Cognition (NFC) affects the memory benefits associated with drawing, generating, and producing while studying. In three experiments, undergraduate students studied a list of words while implementing a designated encoding strategy, followed by a free recall test. Experiment 1 had participants study half of the words by drawing and the other half by writing. In Experiment 2, participants generated half of the words from a definition and typed the other half. Finally, in Experiment 3, participants read half of the words aloud while studying, and read the remaining words silently. The three experiments replicated the memory benefits associated with the drawing effect, generation effect, and production effect (i.e., better recall from the more elaborative strategy), but NFC did not significantly predict the magnitude of these memory benefits or overall recall performance. These findings suggest that these encoding strategies may aid memory regardless of NFC level.

Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.